From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:05:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <47E91256.3010000@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:40500 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753820AbYCZXFR (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:05:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47E91256.3010000@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Tue\, 25 Mar 2008 10\:55\:18 -0400") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jeff Garzik writes: > So quite honestly a CONFIG_BROKEN patch might indeed be more > appropriate since generic HDLC works with Frame Relay at least... Actually my question was intended for Andrew as he has already queued the PPP patch - I probably should have rearranged To/Cc: headers, sorry about that. The question still stands: I guess it's fair enough to have either patch in 2.6.25 (new PPP or "BROKEN" in Kconfig) but I think we shouldn't leave it as is. -- Krzysztof Halasa