From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: wan/pc300 bug found] Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:55:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4559D5BF.3080605@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Francois Romieu , Netdev List Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:28571 "EHLO khc.piap.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933444AbWKNPz3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:55:29 -0500 To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <4559D5BF.3080605@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:42:07 -0500") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik writes: > FYI... I'm certainly willing to remove pc300, if nobody wants it. > > But I am unsure whether this is a case of "vendor doesn't care" or > "users don't care", which are two very different things... I have a driver for PC300/RSV (dual V.35 + V.24) for years. I'm told it works with X.21 version too. If someone has a spare T1/E1 card (non-returnable donation only) I can try to add support as well. T1/E1 is too complicated to maintain without the actual hardware. Perhaps we should add my driver to the tree, mark the old one as obsolete and look for angry reports from T1/E1 users? My driver(s) doesn't support MLPPP but that's probably easy to change if there is any interest. -- Krzysztof Halasa