From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: wan/pc300 bug found] Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:00:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4559D5BF.3080605@garzik.org> <458423C3.2080002@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Francois Romieu , Netdev List To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:51108 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965579AbXA3PAc (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:00:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <458423C3.2080002@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:50:11 -0500") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi, Jeff Garzik writes: >> I have a driver for PC300/RSV (dual V.35 + V.24) for years. I'm told >> it works with X.21 version too. If someone has a spare T1/E1 card >> (non-returnable donation only) I can try to add support as well. >> T1/E1 is too complicated to maintain without the actual hardware. >> Perhaps we should add my driver to the tree, mark the old one as >> obsolete and look for angry reports from T1/E1 users? > > No objections... Great. I'm not marking the original pc300 driver as obsolete - should I? It supports (at least theoretically) multi line PPP and PC300 T1/E1, my drivers don't. -- Krzysztof Halasa