From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:50:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20080424.063006.153647297.davem@davemloft.net> <20080424.065555.30390704.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jeff@garzik.org, paulkf@microgate.com, jchapman@katalix.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from OSB1387.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:36521 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751270AbYDXUu0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:50:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Krzysztof Halasa's message of "Thu\, 24 Apr 2008 22\:46\:34 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > But I'm not > against using generic PPP, it's (AFAICS) clean and *working* and > *maintained* (and I'm not worried about backward compatibility and > certainly not about users' visions). IOW I value correctness over backward compatibility and users' visions, obviously I try to keep compatibility and meet users' needs when it actually makes sense. -- Krzysztof Halasa