From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Mayatskikh Subject: Re: speed regression in udp_lib_lport_inuse() Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:14:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4978EE03.9040207@cosmosbay.com> <49790C02.90800@cosmosbay.com> <4979ADCA.2080106@cosmosbay.com> <4979C9B6.3080302@cosmosbay.com> <4979EABB.4030201@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.26]:35021 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755309AbZAWQO5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:14:57 -0500 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so982308eye.37 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:14:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4979EABB.4030201@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: At Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:05:15 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Both randomness and speed are good. There're several never bound ports > > in the test, but only few. Thank you for the patch. > > I guess "never bound ports" were already in use by other applications on your machine :) Possibly, but not very probably :) -- wbr, Vitaly