From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@wide.ad.jp>
Subject: Re: sysctl variable to force IGMP version [PATCH]
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:10:28 +0900
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <m3wu6p6c3f.wl@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
References: <20040213135020.fd1564f%hibi665@oki.com>
	<OF530A0FD3.685C9BE8-ON88256E39.0064C761-88256E39.00658CC3@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - =?ISO-2022-JP?B?IhskQjVtGyhC?=
 =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJU5DKxsoQiI=?=)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Takashi Hibi <hibi665@oki.com>, davem@redhat.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF530A0FD3.685C9BE8-ON88256E39.0064C761-88256E39.00658CC3@us.ibm.com>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

At Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:31:54 -0800,
David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> I didn't plan on it. Forcing IGMPv2 is needed for some
> switches that do IGMP snooping and don't understand IGMPv3, but
> I'm not aware of any switches that do MLD snooping.

Cisco Catalyst 6500 with 720 Supervisor module does.

-- Yuji Sekiya