From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: don't mask result of bpf_csum_diff() in test_verifier
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:14:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mb61p1q09d2eb.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31b8ea3b-f765-43c0-9cee-49bc13064f04@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1212 bytes --]
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> writes:
> On 10/21/24 14:21, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
>> The bpf_csum_diff() helper has been fixed to return a 16-bit value for
>> all archs, so now we don't need to mask the result.
>>
>> ...
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c
>> @@ -368,8 +368,7 @@ __naked void a_read_only_array_2_1(void)
>> r4 = 0; \
>> r5 = 0; \
>> call %[bpf_csum_diff]; \
>> -l0_%=: r0 &= 0xffff; \
>> - exit; \
>> +l0_%=: exit; \
>
> Instead of dropping the masking, would it make sense to
> check here if (r0 >> 16) == 0 ?
We define the expected value in R0 to be 65507(0xffe3) in the line at the top:
__success __retval(65507)
So, we should just not do anything to R0 and it should contain this value
after returning from bpf_csum_diff()
This masking hack was added in:
6185266c5a853 ("selftests/bpf: Mask bpf_csum_diff() return value to 16 bits in test_verifier")
because without the fix in patch 2 bpf_csum_diff() would return the
following for this test:
x86 : -29 : 0xffffffe3
generic (arm64, riscv) : 65507 : 0x0000ffe3
Thanks,
Puranjay
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 255 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-21 12:21 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] Optimize bpf_csum_diff() and homogenize for all archs Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-21 12:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] net: checksum: move from32to16() to generic header Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-21 13:41 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-10-22 9:49 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-10-22 13:50 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-21 12:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: bpf_csum_diff: optimize and homogenize for all archs Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-21 13:42 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-10-22 9:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-10-22 18:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-21 12:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: don't mask result of bpf_csum_diff() in test_verifier Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-21 13:01 ` Helge Deller
2024-10-21 13:14 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2024-10-21 14:04 ` Helge Deller
2024-10-21 13:42 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-10-22 9:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-10-21 12:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for bpf_csum_diff() helper Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-21 13:43 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-10-21 23:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-22 10:21 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-22 17:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-22 17:58 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-23 15:37 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-21 12:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add a selftest for bpf_csum_diff() Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-21 13:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mb61p1q09d2eb.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).