[PATCH bpf-next v6 0/3] Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline

[PATCH bpf-next v6 0/3] Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline

[Pu Lehui]

This patch adds 12 function arguments support for riscv64 bpf
trampoline. The current bpf trampoline supports <= sizeof(u64) bytes
scalar arguments [0] and <= 16 bytes struct arguments [1]. Therefore, we
focus on the situation where scalars are at most XLEN bits and
aggregates whose total size does not exceed 2×XLEN bits in the riscv
calling convention [2].

Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6184 [0]
Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6769 [1]
Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/download/draft-20230929-e5c800e661a53efe3c2678d71a306323b60eb13b/riscv-abi.pdf [2]

v6:
- Remove unnecessary skel detach ops as it will be covered by skel destroy ops.

v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240702013730.1082285-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/
- Remove unnecessary copyright.

v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240622022129.3844473-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/
- Separate many args test logic from tracing_struct. (Daniel)

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403072818.1462811-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/
- Variable and macro name alignment:
  nr_reg_args: number of args in reg
  nr_stack_args: number of args on stack
  RV_MAX_REG_ARGS: macro for riscv max args in reg

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403041710.1416369-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/
- Add tracing_struct to DENYLIST.aarch64 while aarch64 does not yet support
  bpf trampoline with more than 8 args.
- Change the macro RV_MAX_ARG_REGS to RV_MAX_ARGS_REG to synchronize with
  the variable definition below.
- Add some comments for stk_arg_off and magic number of skip slots for loading
  args on stack.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240331092405.822571-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/

Pu Lehui (3):
  riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline
  selftests/bpf: Factor out many args tests from tracing_struct
  selftests/bpf: Add testcase where 7th argment is struct

 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c               | 66 +++++++++----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64  |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 19 ++++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 44 ++++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c      | 54 -----------
 .../bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c      | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c

-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH bpf-next v6 1/3] riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline

[Pu Lehui]

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

This patch adds 12 function arguments support for riscv64 bpf
trampoline. The current bpf trampoline supports <= sizeof(u64) bytes
scalar arguments [0] and <= 16 bytes struct arguments [1]. Therefore, we
focus on the situation where scalars are at most XLEN bits and
aggregates whose total size does not exceed 2×XLEN bits in the riscv
calling convention [2].

Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6184 [0]
Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6769 [1]
Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/download/draft-20230929-e5c800e661a53efe3c2678d71a306323b60eb13b/riscv-abi.pdf [2]
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 351e1484205e..685c7389ae7e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <asm/percpu.h>
 #include "bpf_jit.h"
 
+#define RV_MAX_REG_ARGS 8
 #define RV_FENTRY_NINSNS 2
 /* imm that allows emit_imm to emit max count insns */
 #define RV_MAX_COUNT_IMM 0x7FFF7FF7FF7FF7FF
@@ -692,26 +693,45 @@ int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type poke_type,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void store_args(int nregs, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
+static void store_args(int nr_arg_slots, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++) {
-		emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -args_off, RV_REG_A0 + i, ctx);
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_arg_slots; i++) {
+		if (i < RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) {
+			emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -args_off, RV_REG_A0 + i, ctx);
+		} else {
+			/* skip slots for T0 and FP of traced function */
+			emit_ld(RV_REG_T1, 16 + (i - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) * 8, RV_REG_FP, ctx);
+			emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -args_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
+		}
 		args_off -= 8;
 	}
 }
 
-static void restore_args(int nregs, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
+static void restore_args(int nr_reg_args, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_reg_args; i++) {
 		emit_ld(RV_REG_A0 + i, -args_off, RV_REG_FP, ctx);
 		args_off -= 8;
 	}
 }
 
+static void restore_stack_args(int nr_stack_args, int args_off, int stk_arg_off,
+			       struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_stack_args; i++) {
+		emit_ld(RV_REG_T1, -(args_off - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS * 8), RV_REG_FP, ctx);
+		emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -stk_arg_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
+		args_off -= 8;
+		stk_arg_off -= 8;
+	}
+}
+
 static int invoke_bpf_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *l, int args_off, int retval_off,
 			   int run_ctx_off, bool save_ret, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
@@ -784,8 +804,8 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 {
 	int i, ret, offset;
 	int *branches_off = NULL;
-	int stack_size = 0, nregs = m->nr_args;
-	int retval_off, args_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, sreg_off;
+	int stack_size = 0, nr_arg_slots = 0;
+	int retval_off, args_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, sreg_off, stk_arg_off;
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *fentry = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *fexit = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *fmod_ret = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
@@ -831,20 +851,21 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	 * FP - sreg_off    [ callee saved reg	]
 	 *
 	 *		    [ pads              ] pads for 16 bytes alignment
+	 *
+	 *		    [ stack_argN        ]
+	 *		    [ ...               ]
+	 * FP - stk_arg_off [ stack_arg1        ] BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG
 	 */
 
 	if (flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK | BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY))
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
 
-	/* extra regiters for struct arguments */
-	for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++)
-		if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG)
-			nregs += round_up(m->arg_size[i], 8) / 8 - 1;
-
-	/* 8 arguments passed by registers */
-	if (nregs > 8)
+	if (m->nr_args > MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
 
+	for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++)
+		nr_arg_slots += round_up(m->arg_size[i], 8) / 8;
+
 	/* room of trampoline frame to store return address and frame pointer */
 	stack_size += 16;
 
@@ -854,7 +875,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 		retval_off = stack_size;
 	}
 
-	stack_size += nregs * 8;
+	stack_size += nr_arg_slots * 8;
 	args_off = stack_size;
 
 	stack_size += 8;
@@ -871,8 +892,14 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	stack_size += 8;
 	sreg_off = stack_size;
 
+	if (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS > 0)
+		stack_size += (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) * 8;
+
 	stack_size = round_up(stack_size, STACK_ALIGN);
 
+	/* room for args on stack must be at the top of stack */
+	stk_arg_off = stack_size;
+
 	if (!is_struct_ops) {
 		/* For the trampoline called from function entry,
 		 * the frame of traced function and the frame of
@@ -908,10 +935,10 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 		emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -ip_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
 	}
 
-	emit_li(RV_REG_T1, nregs, ctx);
+	emit_li(RV_REG_T1, nr_arg_slots, ctx);
 	emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -nregs_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
 
-	store_args(nregs, args_off, ctx);
+	store_args(nr_arg_slots, args_off, ctx);
 
 	/* skip to actual body of traced function */
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME)
@@ -951,7 +978,8 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	}
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
-		restore_args(nregs, args_off, ctx);
+		restore_args(min_t(int, nr_arg_slots, RV_MAX_REG_ARGS), args_off, ctx);
+		restore_stack_args(nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS, args_off, stk_arg_off, ctx);
 		ret = emit_call((const u64)orig_call, true, ctx);
 		if (ret)
 			goto out;
@@ -986,7 +1014,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	}
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS)
-		restore_args(nregs, args_off, ctx);
+		restore_args(min_t(int, nr_arg_slots, RV_MAX_REG_ARGS), args_off, ctx);
 
 	if (save_ret) {
 		emit_ld(RV_REG_A0, -retval_off, RV_REG_FP, ctx);
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/3] riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline

[Puranjay Mohan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1002 bytes --]

Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com> writes:

> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
>
> This patch adds 12 function arguments support for riscv64 bpf
> trampoline. The current bpf trampoline supports <= sizeof(u64) bytes
> scalar arguments [0] and <= 16 bytes struct arguments [1]. Therefore, we
> focus on the situation where scalars are at most XLEN bits and
> aggregates whose total size does not exceed 2×XLEN bits in the riscv
> calling convention [2].
>
> Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6184 [0]
> Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6769 [1]
> Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/download/draft-20230929-e5c800e661a53efe3c2678d71a306323b60eb13b/riscv-abi.pdf [2]
> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>

Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Puranjay

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 255 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/3] riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline

[Puranjay Mohan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5831 bytes --]

Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com> writes:

> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
>
> This patch adds 12 function arguments support for riscv64 bpf
> trampoline. The current bpf trampoline supports <= sizeof(u64) bytes
> scalar arguments [0] and <= 16 bytes struct arguments [1]. Therefore, we
> focus on the situation where scalars are at most XLEN bits and
> aggregates whose total size does not exceed 2×XLEN bits in the riscv
> calling convention [2].
>
> Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6184 [0]
> Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6769 [1]
> Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/download/draft-20230929-e5c800e661a53efe3c2678d71a306323b60eb13b/riscv-abi.pdf [2]
> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 351e1484205e..685c7389ae7e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <asm/percpu.h>
>  #include "bpf_jit.h"
>  
> +#define RV_MAX_REG_ARGS 8
>  #define RV_FENTRY_NINSNS 2
>  /* imm that allows emit_imm to emit max count insns */
>  #define RV_MAX_COUNT_IMM 0x7FFF7FF7FF7FF7FF
> @@ -692,26 +693,45 @@ int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type poke_type,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void store_args(int nregs, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
> +static void store_args(int nr_arg_slots, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++) {
> -		emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -args_off, RV_REG_A0 + i, ctx);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_arg_slots; i++) {
> +		if (i < RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) {
> +			emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -args_off, RV_REG_A0 + i, ctx);
> +		} else {
> +			/* skip slots for T0 and FP of traced function */
> +			emit_ld(RV_REG_T1, 16 + (i - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) * 8, RV_REG_FP, ctx);
> +			emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -args_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
> +		}
>  		args_off -= 8;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void restore_args(int nregs, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
> +static void restore_args(int nr_reg_args, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_reg_args; i++) {
>  		emit_ld(RV_REG_A0 + i, -args_off, RV_REG_FP, ctx);
>  		args_off -= 8;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void restore_stack_args(int nr_stack_args, int args_off, int stk_arg_off,
> +			       struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_stack_args; i++) {
> +		emit_ld(RV_REG_T1, -(args_off - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS * 8), RV_REG_FP, ctx);
> +		emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -stk_arg_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
> +		args_off -= 8;
> +		stk_arg_off -= 8;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int invoke_bpf_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *l, int args_off, int retval_off,
>  			   int run_ctx_off, bool save_ret, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>  {
> @@ -784,8 +804,8 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
>  {
>  	int i, ret, offset;
>  	int *branches_off = NULL;
> -	int stack_size = 0, nregs = m->nr_args;
> -	int retval_off, args_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, sreg_off;
> +	int stack_size = 0, nr_arg_slots = 0;
> +	int retval_off, args_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, sreg_off, stk_arg_off;
>  	struct bpf_tramp_links *fentry = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
>  	struct bpf_tramp_links *fexit = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
>  	struct bpf_tramp_links *fmod_ret = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
> @@ -831,20 +851,21 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
>  	 * FP - sreg_off    [ callee saved reg	]
>  	 *
>  	 *		    [ pads              ] pads for 16 bytes alignment
> +	 *
> +	 *		    [ stack_argN        ]
> +	 *		    [ ...               ]
> +	 * FP - stk_arg_off [ stack_arg1        ] BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG
>  	 */
>  
>  	if (flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK | BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY))
>  		return -ENOTSUPP;
>  
> -	/* extra regiters for struct arguments */
> -	for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++)
> -		if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG)
> -			nregs += round_up(m->arg_size[i], 8) / 8 - 1;
> -
> -	/* 8 arguments passed by registers */
> -	if (nregs > 8)
> +	if (m->nr_args > MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
>  		return -ENOTSUPP;
>  
> +	for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++)
> +		nr_arg_slots += round_up(m->arg_size[i], 8) / 8;
> +
>  	/* room of trampoline frame to store return address and frame pointer */
>  	stack_size += 16;
>  
> @@ -854,7 +875,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
>  		retval_off = stack_size;
>  	}
>  
> -	stack_size += nregs * 8;
> +	stack_size += nr_arg_slots * 8;
>  	args_off = stack_size;
>  
>  	stack_size += 8;
> @@ -871,8 +892,14 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
>  	stack_size += 8;
>  	sreg_off = stack_size;
>  
> +	if (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS > 0)
> +		stack_size += (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) * 8;

Hi Pu,
Although this is merged now, while working on this for arm64 I realised
that the above doesn't check for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG and can waste
some stack space, we should change this to:

if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) && (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS > 0))
        stack_size += (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) * 8;

It will save some stack space when BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is not set?

I can send a patch if you think this is worth fixing.


Thanks,
Puranjay

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 255 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/3] riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline

[Pu Lehui]

On 2024/7/5 20:51, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com> writes:
> 
>> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
>>
>> This patch adds 12 function arguments support for riscv64 bpf
>> trampoline. The current bpf trampoline supports <= sizeof(u64) bytes
>> scalar arguments [0] and <= 16 bytes struct arguments [1]. Therefore, we
>> focus on the situation where scalars are at most XLEN bits and
>> aggregates whose total size does not exceed 2×XLEN bits in the riscv
>> calling convention [2].
[SNIP]
>> @@ -854,7 +875,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
>>   		retval_off = stack_size;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	stack_size += nregs * 8;
>> +	stack_size += nr_arg_slots * 8;
>>   	args_off = stack_size;
>>   
>>   	stack_size += 8;
>> @@ -871,8 +892,14 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
>>   	stack_size += 8;
>>   	sreg_off = stack_size;
>>   
>> +	if (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS > 0)
>> +		stack_size += (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) * 8;
> 
> Hi Pu,
> Although this is merged now, while working on this for arm64 I realised
> that the above doesn't check for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG and can waste
> some stack space, we should change this to:
> 
> if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) && (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS > 0))
>          stack_size += (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) * 8;
> 
> It will save some stack space when BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is not set?

Nice catch. It will be better. Feel free to patch it. Thanks!

> 
> I can send a patch if you think this is worth fixing.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Puranjay

[PATCH bpf-next v6 2/3] selftests/bpf: Factor out many args tests from tracing_struct

[Pu Lehui]

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

Factor out many args tests from tracing_struct and rename some function
names to make more sense. Meanwhile, remove unnecessary skeleton detach
operation as it will be covered by skeleton destroy operation.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 30 ++++++++--
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c      | 54 -----------------
 .../bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c      | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
index fe0fb0c9849a..cb2a95da2617 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
@@ -3,8 +3,9 @@
 
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include "tracing_struct.skel.h"
+#include "tracing_struct_many_args.skel.h"
 
-static void test_fentry(void)
+static void test_struct_args(void)
 {
 	struct tracing_struct *skel;
 	int err;
@@ -55,6 +56,25 @@ static void test_fentry(void)
 
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t6, 1, "t6 ret");
 
+destroy_skel:
+	tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_struct_many_args(void)
+{
+	struct tracing_struct_many_args *skel;
+	int err;
+
+	skel = tracing_struct_many_args__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "tracing_struct_many_args__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	err = tracing_struct_many_args__attach(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tracing_struct_many_args__attach"))
+		goto destroy_skel;
+
+	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(256), "trigger_read");
+
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_a, 16, "t7:a");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_b, 17, "t7:b");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_c, 18, "t7:c");
@@ -74,12 +94,14 @@ static void test_fentry(void)
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_g, 23, "t8:g");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_ret, 156, "t8 ret");
 
-	tracing_struct__detach(skel);
 destroy_skel:
-	tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
+	tracing_struct_many_args__destroy(skel);
 }
 
 void test_tracing_struct(void)
 {
-	test_fentry();
+	if (test__start_subtest("struct_args"))
+		test_struct_args();
+	if (test__start_subtest("struct_many_args"))
+		test_struct_many_args();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
index 515daef3c84b..c435a3a8328a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
@@ -18,11 +18,6 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 {
 	int b[];
 };
 
-struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 {
-	u64 a;
-	int b;
-};
-
 long t1_a_a, t1_a_b, t1_b, t1_c, t1_ret, t1_nregs;
 __u64 t1_reg0, t1_reg1, t1_reg2, t1_reg3;
 long t2_a, t2_b_a, t2_b_b, t2_c, t2_ret;
@@ -30,9 +25,6 @@ long t3_a, t3_b, t3_c_a, t3_c_b, t3_ret;
 long t4_a_a, t4_b, t4_c, t4_d, t4_e_a, t4_e_b, t4_ret;
 long t5_ret;
 int t6;
-long t7_a, t7_b, t7_c, t7_d, t7_e, t7_f_a, t7_f_b, t7_ret;
-long t8_a, t8_b, t8_c, t8_d, t8_e, t8_f_a, t8_f_b, t8_g, t8_ret;
-
 
 SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1")
 int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_1, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2, a, int, b, int, c)
@@ -138,50 +130,4 @@ int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_11, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *, a)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
-int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_12, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
-	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f)
-{
-	t7_a = a;
-	t7_b = (long)b;
-	t7_c = c;
-	t7_d = d;
-	t7_e = (long)e;
-	t7_f_a = f.a;
-	t7_f_b = f.b;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
-int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_13, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
-	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, ret)
-{
-	t7_ret = ret;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
-int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_14, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
-	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g)
-{
-	t8_a = a;
-	t8_b = (long)b;
-	t8_c = c;
-	t8_d = d;
-	t8_e = (long)e;
-	t8_f_a = f.a;
-	t8_f_b = f.b;
-	t8_g = g;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
-int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_15, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
-	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g,
-	      int, ret)
-{
-	t8_ret = ret;
-	return 0;
-}
-
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3de4bb918178
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 {
+	u64 a;
+	int b;
+};
+
+long t7_a, t7_b, t7_c, t7_d, t7_e, t7_f_a, t7_f_b, t7_ret;
+long t8_a, t8_b, t8_c, t8_d, t8_e, t8_f_a, t8_f_b, t8_g, t8_ret;
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_1, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f)
+{
+	t7_a = a;
+	t7_b = (long)b;
+	t7_c = c;
+	t7_d = d;
+	t7_e = (long)e;
+	t7_f_a = f.a;
+	t7_f_b = f.b;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_2, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, ret)
+{
+	t7_ret = ret;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_3, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g)
+{
+	t8_a = a;
+	t8_b = (long)b;
+	t8_c = c;
+	t8_d = d;
+	t8_e = (long)e;
+	t8_f_a = f.a;
+	t8_f_b = f.b;
+	t8_g = g;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_4, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g,
+	      int, ret)
+{
+	t8_ret = ret;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH bpf-next v6 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add testcase where 7th argment is struct

[Pu Lehui]

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

Add testcase where 7th argument is struct for architectures with 8
argument registers, and increase the complexity of the struct.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64  |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 19 ++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 14 ++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c      | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
index 0445ac38bc07..3c7c3e79aa93 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ kprobe_multi_test                                # needs CONFIG_FPROBE
 module_attach                                    # prog 'kprobe_multi': failed to auto-attach: -95
 fentry_test/fentry_many_args                     # fentry_many_args:FAIL:fentry_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
 fexit_test/fexit_many_args                       # fexit_many_args:FAIL:fexit_many_args_attach unexpected error: -524
+tracing_struct/struct_many_args                  # struct_many_args:FAIL:tracing_struct_many_args__attach unexpected error: -524
 fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_link_info            # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
 fill_link_info/kretprobe_multi_link_info         # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
 fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_invalid_ubuff        # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index d8bd01d8560b..f8962a1dd397 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -53,6 +53,13 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 {
 	int b;
 };
 
+struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5 {
+	char a;
+	short b;
+	int c;
+	long d;
+};
+
 __bpf_hook_start();
 
 noinline int
@@ -110,6 +117,15 @@ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e,
 	return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
 }
 
+noinline int
+bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_9(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f,
+			      short g, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5 h, long i)
+{
+	bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e +
+		f + g + h.a + h.b + h.c + h.d + i;
+	return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
+}
+
 noinline int
 bpf_testmod_test_arg_ptr_to_struct(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 *a) {
 	bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a->a;
@@ -305,6 +321,7 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
 	struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 struct_arg2 = {2, 3};
 	struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *struct_arg3;
 	struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 struct_arg4 = {21, 22};
+	struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5 struct_arg5 = {23, 24, 25, 26};
 	int i = 1;
 
 	while (bpf_testmod_return_ptr(i))
@@ -319,6 +336,8 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
 					    (void *)20, struct_arg4);
 	(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8(16, (void *)17, 18, 19,
 					    (void *)20, struct_arg4, 23);
+	(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_9(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20,
+					    21, 22, struct_arg5, 27);
 
 	(void)bpf_testmod_test_arg_ptr_to_struct(&struct_arg1_2);
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
index cb2a95da2617..19e68d4b3532 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
@@ -94,6 +94,20 @@ static void test_struct_many_args(void)
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_g, 23, "t8:g");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_ret, 156, "t8 ret");
 
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_a, 16, "t9:a");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_b, 17, "t9:b");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_c, 18, "t9:c");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_d, 19, "t9:d");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_e, 20, "t9:e");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_f, 21, "t9:f");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_g, 22, "t9:f");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_h_a, 23, "t9:h.a");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_h_b, 24, "t9:h.b");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_h_c, 25, "t9:h.c");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_h_d, 26, "t9:h.d");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_i, 27, "t9:i");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t9_ret, 258, "t9 ret");
+
 destroy_skel:
 	tracing_struct_many_args__destroy(skel);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c
index 3de4bb918178..4742012ace06 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c
@@ -8,8 +8,16 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 {
 	int b;
 };
 
+struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5 {
+	char a;
+	short b;
+	int c;
+	long d;
+};
+
 long t7_a, t7_b, t7_c, t7_d, t7_e, t7_f_a, t7_f_b, t7_ret;
 long t8_a, t8_b, t8_c, t8_d, t8_e, t8_f_a, t8_f_b, t8_g, t8_ret;
+long t9_a, t9_b, t9_c, t9_d, t9_e, t9_f, t9_g, t9_h_a, t9_h_b, t9_h_c, t9_h_d, t9_i, t9_ret;
 
 SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
 int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_1, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
@@ -57,4 +65,31 @@ int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_4, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_9")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_5, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d, void *, e,
+	      char, f, short, g, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5, h, long, i)
+{
+	t9_a = a;
+	t9_b = (long)b;
+	t9_c = c;
+	t9_d = d;
+	t9_e = (long)e;
+	t9_f = f;
+	t9_g = g;
+	t9_h_a = h.a;
+	t9_h_b = h.b;
+	t9_h_c = h.c;
+	t9_h_d = h.d;
+	t9_i = i;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_9")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_6, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d, void *, e,
+	      char, f, short, g, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_5, h, long, i, int, ret)
+{
+	t9_ret = ret;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/3] Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline

[Jiri Olsa]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 12:19:41PM +0000, Pu Lehui wrote:
> This patch adds 12 function arguments support for riscv64 bpf
> trampoline. The current bpf trampoline supports <= sizeof(u64) bytes
> scalar arguments [0] and <= 16 bytes struct arguments [1]. Therefore, we
> focus on the situation where scalars are at most XLEN bits and
> aggregates whose total size does not exceed 2×XLEN bits in the riscv
> calling convention [2].
> 
> Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6184 [0]
> Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6769 [1]
> Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/download/draft-20230929-e5c800e661a53efe3c2678d71a306323b60eb13b/riscv-abi.pdf [2]
> 
> v6:
> - Remove unnecessary skel detach ops as it will be covered by skel destroy ops.

selftests bits lgtm

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

jirka

> 
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240702013730.1082285-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/
> - Remove unnecessary copyright.
> 
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240622022129.3844473-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/
> - Separate many args test logic from tracing_struct. (Daniel)
> 
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403072818.1462811-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/
> - Variable and macro name alignment:
>   nr_reg_args: number of args in reg
>   nr_stack_args: number of args on stack
>   RV_MAX_REG_ARGS: macro for riscv max args in reg
> 
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403041710.1416369-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/
> - Add tracing_struct to DENYLIST.aarch64 while aarch64 does not yet support
>   bpf trampoline with more than 8 args.
> - Change the macro RV_MAX_ARG_REGS to RV_MAX_ARGS_REG to synchronize with
>   the variable definition below.
> - Add some comments for stk_arg_off and magic number of skip slots for loading
>   args on stack.
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240331092405.822571-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/
> 
> Pu Lehui (3):
>   riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline
>   selftests/bpf: Factor out many args tests from tracing_struct
>   selftests/bpf: Add testcase where 7th argment is struct
> 
>  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c               | 66 +++++++++----
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64  |  1 +
>  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 19 ++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 44 ++++++++-
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c      | 54 -----------
>  .../bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c      | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/3] Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Tue,  2 Jul 2024 12:19:41 +0000 you wrote:
> This patch adds 12 function arguments support for riscv64 bpf
> trampoline. The current bpf trampoline supports <= sizeof(u64) bytes
> scalar arguments [0] and <= 16 bytes struct arguments [1]. Therefore, we
> focus on the situation where scalars are at most XLEN bits and
> aggregates whose total size does not exceed 2×XLEN bits in the riscv
> calling convention [2].
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v6,1/3] riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6801b0aef79d
  - [bpf-next,v6,2/3] selftests/bpf: Factor out many args tests from tracing_struct
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5d52ad36683a
  - [bpf-next,v6,3/3] selftests/bpf: Add testcase where 7th argment is struct
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9474f72cd657

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html