* ¥x·s»È¦æ±À¥X1.99%§C§Q¥d¥NÀv,¥un¦³¤u§@,«ù¥dº¡¥b¦~§Y¥i¿ì²z...
From: auux @ 2005-08-12 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 26 bytes --]
請切換超文本（HTML）格式
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5095 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH] add new iptables ipt_connbytes match
From: David S. Miller @ 2005-08-12 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: laforge; +Cc: netdev, netfilter-devel, ak, kaber
In-Reply-To: <20050812153730.GR18580@rama.de.gnumonks.org>
From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:37:30 +0200
> But getting back to the original connbytes issue. Is it worth fixing
> it, if the core iptables doesn't even work (the "old bug")?
I think it is a good policy to not let in new code, regardless of
context, which uses __u64 in user visible structures a way we know
isn't compatible.
So please let's fix this up.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Strange uses of netif_start_queue
From: David S. Miller @ 2005-08-12 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ralf; +Cc: alan, netdev
In-Reply-To: <20050812133905.GF2819@linux-mips.org>
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:39:05 +0100
> To answer the fundamental question, I think netif_start_queue /
> netif_stop_queue should be allowed in case the driver for some reason has
> the desire to stop queueing of packet immediately after register_netdev.
I disagree. register_netdev() does not make packets start getting
queued, you have to up the interface for that to start occuring.
And your ->open() routine has full control over that.
^ permalink raw reply
* ½ºÅ¸Å©·¡ÇÁÆ®ÀÇÁ¤º¹..! ÇÁ·Î°ÔÀ̸ÓÀÇÁö¸§±æ!
From: ±è¼±¾Æ @ 2005-08-12 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1362 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Strange uses of netif_start_queue
From: David S. Miller @ 2005-08-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alan; +Cc: netdev
In-Reply-To: <1123853714.22460.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:35:14 +0100
> Something I noticed doing the tty work. the 6pack driver calls
> netif_start_queue() before it calls register_netdev. I'm curious if this
> is allowed ?
It's definitely a bug, and when register_netdev() happens it will
just overwrite that change of state.
Since the queue is not initialized yet, this could also cause
a crash or hang. :-)
^ permalink raw reply
* ¢ÀÀ¯Åë°ü¸®»ç(10¿ù29ÀϽÃÇè):Àü¹®ÀηºÎÁ· -> ±âÃâ¹®Á¦+¹«·áÀÚ·á½ÅûÀÚ¿¡°Ô ¹«·á·Îº¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
From: À¯Åë°ü¸®»ç @ 2005-08-12 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: majordomo
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 2629 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* "¾à¿ë½Ä¹°°ü¸®»ç"ÇÕ°Ý·ü 99% ÃâÁ¦ÀÚ·á ¹«·á·Îµå¸³´Ï´Ù.^^**
From: Constance Lynn @ 2005-08-12 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1718 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* (±¤°í)°¢Á¾¾Ï°ú,¹ß±âºÎÀü,½Å°æ,³ú¿¡¾Ç¿µÇâÀ» ³¢Ä¡´ÂÀüÀÚÆÄ!!Â÷´ÜÇؾßÇÕ´Ï´Ù@
From: °Ç°Á¤º¸ @ 2005-08-12 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1904 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* °í°´´ÔÀÇ ´ëÃâ/´ë³³¹®Á¦¸¦ ¼Ó½Ã¿øÇÏ°ÔÇØ°áÇص帮°Ú½À´Ï´Ù. t
From: ekshxvojstdsg9243138765 @ 2005-08-12 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1086 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] netpoll: various bugfixes
From: Olaf Hering @ 2005-08-12 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Mackall
Cc: Andrew Morton, David S. Miller, ak, Jeff Moyer, netdev,
linux-kernel, mingo, john.ronciak, rostedt
In-Reply-To: <1.502409567@selenic.com>
On Thu, Aug 11, Matt Mackall wrote:
> This patch series cleans up a few outstanding bugs in netpoll:
>
> - two bugfixes from Jeff Moyer's netpoll bonding
> - a tweak to e1000's netpoll stub
> - timeout handling for e1000 with carrier loss
> - prefilling SKBs at init
> - a fix-up for a race discovered in initialization
> - an unused variable warning
Matt, I have tested them, the sender doesnt lockup anymore. But a
task dump doesnt work, I get only the first task. This is on a 3GHz xeon
with tg3 card.
^ permalink raw reply
* [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] S2io: Hardware fixes for Xframe II adapter
From: ravinandan.arakali @ 2005-08-12 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jgarzik, netdev
Cc: raghavendra.koushik, ravinandan.arakali, leonid.grossman,
rapuru.sriram, ananda.raju
Hi,
Patch Description:
This patch incorporates the following hardware fixes required
for Xframe II adapter.
1. New values to program the dtx_control register.
2. Disable memory controller interrupts(MC_INTR) since these
are now monitored thru' a poll routine.
3. Don't reset an XframeII card on an ECC double-bit error(It
can recover).
4. Save/restore PCI config space before/after a reset irrespective
of Xframe I or II card.
5. Bumped up the driver version no. to 2.0.3.1
Please review the patch and apply the same if it looks ok.
Signed-off-by: Ravinandan Arakali <ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com>
---
diff -urN old/drivers/net/s2io.c new/drivers/net/s2io.c
--- old/drivers/net/s2io.c 2005-08-12 01:29:56.000000000 -0700
+++ new/drivers/net/s2io.c 2005-08-12 01:30:12.000000000 -0700
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
/* S2io Driver name & version. */
static char s2io_driver_name[] = "Neterion";
-static char s2io_driver_version[] = "Version 2.0.2.1";
+static char s2io_driver_version[] = "Version 2.0.3.1";
static inline int RXD_IS_UP2DT(RxD_t *rxdp)
{
@@ -210,14 +210,18 @@
static u64 herc_act_dtx_cfg[] = {
/* Set address */
- 0x80000515BA750000ULL, 0x80000515BA7500E0ULL,
+ 0x8000051536750000ULL, 0x80000515367500E0ULL,
/* Write data */
- 0x80000515BA750004ULL, 0x80000515BA7500E4ULL,
+ 0x8000051536750004ULL, 0x80000515367500E4ULL,
/* Set address */
0x80010515003F0000ULL, 0x80010515003F00E0ULL,
/* Write data */
0x80010515003F0004ULL, 0x80010515003F00E4ULL,
/* Set address */
+ 0x801205150D440000ULL, 0x801205150D4400E0ULL,
+ /* Write data */
+ 0x801205150D440004ULL, 0x801205150D4400E4ULL,
+ /* Set address */
0x80020515F2100000ULL, 0x80020515F21000E0ULL,
/* Write data */
0x80020515F2100004ULL, 0x80020515F21000E4ULL,
@@ -1903,7 +1907,7 @@
}
/* Enable select interrupts */
- interruptible = TX_TRAFFIC_INTR | RX_TRAFFIC_INTR | MC_INTR;
+ interruptible = TX_TRAFFIC_INTR | RX_TRAFFIC_INTR;
interruptible |= TX_PIC_INTR | RX_PIC_INTR;
interruptible |= TX_MAC_INTR | RX_MAC_INTR;
@@ -2030,7 +2034,7 @@
config = &nic->config;
/* Disable all interrupts */
- interruptible = TX_TRAFFIC_INTR | RX_TRAFFIC_INTR | MC_INTR;
+ interruptible = TX_TRAFFIC_INTR | RX_TRAFFIC_INTR;
interruptible |= TX_PIC_INTR | RX_PIC_INTR;
interruptible |= TX_MAC_INTR | RX_MAC_INTR;
en_dis_able_nic_intrs(nic, interruptible, DISABLE_INTRS);
@@ -2688,8 +2692,10 @@
DBG_PRINT(ERR_DBG, "%s: Device indicates ",
dev->name);
DBG_PRINT(ERR_DBG, "double ECC error!!\n");
- netif_stop_queue(dev);
- schedule_work(&nic->rst_timer_task);
+ if (nic->device_type != XFRAME_II_DEVICE) {
+ netif_stop_queue(dev);
+ schedule_work(&nic->rst_timer_task);
+ }
} else {
nic->mac_control.stats_info->sw_stat.
single_ecc_errs++;
@@ -2772,8 +2778,7 @@
u16 subid, pci_cmd;
/* Back up the PCI-X CMD reg, dont want to lose MMRBC, OST settings */
- if (sp->device_type == XFRAME_I_DEVICE)
- pci_read_config_word(sp->pdev, PCIX_COMMAND_REGISTER, &(pci_cmd));
+ pci_read_config_word(sp->pdev, PCIX_COMMAND_REGISTER, &(pci_cmd));
val64 = SW_RESET_ALL;
writeq(val64, &bar0->sw_reset);
@@ -2792,14 +2797,10 @@
*/
msleep(250);
- if (!(sp->device_type & XFRAME_II_DEVICE)) {
- /* Restore the PCI state saved during initializarion. */
- pci_restore_state(sp->pdev);
- pci_write_config_word(sp->pdev, PCIX_COMMAND_REGISTER,
+ /* Restore the PCI state saved during initialization. */
+ pci_restore_state(sp->pdev);
+ pci_write_config_word(sp->pdev, PCIX_COMMAND_REGISTER,
pci_cmd);
- } else {
- pci_set_master(sp->pdev);
- }
s2io_init_pci(sp);
msleep(250);
@@ -5426,9 +5427,7 @@
INIT_WORK(&sp->set_link_task,
(void (*)(void *)) s2io_set_link, sp);
- if (!(sp->device_type & XFRAME_II_DEVICE)) {
- pci_save_state(sp->pdev);
- }
+ pci_save_state(sp->pdev);
/* Setting swapper control on the NIC, for proper reset operation */
if (s2io_set_swapper(sp)) {
^ permalink raw reply
* Âõ¾îÁö°Å³ª ±¸¸Û³¹æÃæ¸ÁÀ» ÀûÀººñ¿ëÀ¸·Î °£´ÜÈ÷º¸¼öÇϼ¼¿ä!!!(½Ç¿ë½Å¾ÈƯÇãÇ°)
From: ¹æÃæ¸Á º¸¼öÀç @ 2005-08-12 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1436 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Á÷ÀåÀÎ,°ø¹«¿ø,³â5.8~12.5%´ë·Î100%½ÂÀÎ,1¾ï¿ø±îÁö~!
From: ±è¼±¾Æ @ 2005-08-12 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 3889 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* ¡á¡á¡á¼±Âø¼ø333¸í²²¸ø¸»¸®´ÂÀ̺¥Æ®¡á¡á¡á k znh hno
From: master @ 2005-08-12 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 4890 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* 超低利息代償..天啊!!!你還再繳高額卡債嗎? 3
From: 台新銀行3 @ 2005-08-12 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: VVwu8one@ms33.hinet.net
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 19 bytes --]
charset="BIG-5"
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3702 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* ¾þ°óùØ¥¶¥ú¤p¬ü¤k¡I
From: Ernesto Lewis @ 2005-08-12 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/alternative, Size: 9917 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* ¦¡¦¡¡Ú¡º¹«Á¦ÇÑ¿µ¾î¡»-¿µ¾î°¡ µÉ¶§±îÁö[¿µ¾îÄ·ÇÁ¹«·á+¿µ¾îÀü¹®µµ¿ì¹ÌÆÄ°ß+¹«Á¦Çѹ«·áüÇè] !!
From: °øÂ¥¿µ¾î @ 2005-08-12 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1739 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* 2005³â ´ÙÀ½°í°´´ëÃâ½ÂÀÎ/Ä«µå´ë³³·ü 100% ÃÖ°í¾÷ü! qkfjtfphxiemmstjb
From: nqkfgahhuoriv9996572857 @ 2005-08-12 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1017 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* °í°´´Ô 5000¸¸¿ø±îÁö¿ù0.7%´ë·Î ¹«¹æ¹®±ÝÀ¶ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´ÙÁï½Ã ½ÅûÇϼ¼¿ä
From: ¸ÂÃã´ëÃâÁ¤º¸ @ 2005-08-12 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: majordomo
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 2957 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* ¹ý¿ø°æ¸Å¿Í °ø¸Å¸¦¾Ë¸é µ·ÀÌ º¸ÀδÙ-¹«·áÀÚ·áÁ¦°ø-
From: ºÎµ¿»ê°ø°æ¸Å @ 2005-08-12 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cvs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 3331 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: More SPAM in Netdev?
From: Tomasz Torcz @ 2005-08-12 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
In-Reply-To: <00cc01c59f55$61a5a790$a20cc60a@amer.sykes.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 516 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:49:09AM -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Hi, Is it me or we are getting much more spam? (The ones with Chinesse
> letters?)
Enormous amounts. It looks like spam filters are down.
Or maybe that a friendly reminder, that netdev is dead, and all activity
got moved to vger lists.
I'm going to take that reminder - unsubscribing now.
--
Tomasz Torcz "Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking
zdzichu@irc.-nie.spam-.pl in the afternoon and evening." - Alan Cox
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 229 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* (unknown),
From: °í¼Ó ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ @ 2005-08-12 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1829 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* From: Mrs. Roseline Ogugua
From: Roseline @ 2005-08-12 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
From: Mrs. Roseline Ogugua
Dear Friend,
I greet you in the name of
our lord. My name is Mrs. Roseline Ogugua. I
am a widow and a mother
of Two all girls. I know you will see my
letter to you as an
embarrassment considering the fact that we do
not know ourselves. I
plead with you to be patient with me I feel
very pleased to contact you
for
some assistance and business relationship. I am a Citizen of
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, married to a Nigerian. I live in Nigeria with my
children. My late husband was a loving, caring and hard working
businessman who died unfortunately in a ghastly auto crash. Before
the
sudden death of my beloved husband, and
father of my daughters, my late
husband intended to establish a
business in the united states of
America with the sum of$15 million
united states dollars, but
unfortunately he died
before this proposed venture.
Following his
death, his family members insisted that I am not
entitled to his
property (Assets and money) since I am a woman and
my offspring's all
girls as I do not have a male child for my
husband. Well, according to
some barbaric traditional laws here in
Nigeria (Africa) which doesn't
permit a woman to inherit a man's
property, as they are expected by
tradition to take over the
management of his business and other
properties including myself
who automatically becomes a wife
to one of
his immediate brothers. Unfortunately to this wicked
family members,
the $10 million united states dollars which my late
husband intended to
use in establishing a business in the United
States was deposited in a
bank account unknown to his family.I and
the Attorney is the only one
aware of this money,so I have
discussed this matter with a staff of the
bank that i want this
money personally so that I will be able to take
care of my
children's educational needs since my husband's family
members
vehemently opposed the furtherance of their education.
According to
the staff of the bank, the best way to secure this money
is to
transfer this money to a bank account out side Nigeria For
safe-
keeping, later it will be used for business establishment
subject to
the
Advise of whosoever finally assists us. At this juncture, I
therefore ask for your sincere assistance in providing us with your
bank details and the enablement to facilitate the
remittance of this
fund into your nominated account. As soon as I
get your positive
response, I shall provide you with all the
necessary detail for this
transfer.
However, I have decided to to give you 30% of the total
money as a
reward for your sincere assistance and the remaining 70% of
the
money will be for my investment as I will want to keep aglow my
late husbands dream of investing in real estate. To be able to help
me,
kindly send through myemail, your personal details including
your
contact information for easy communication.
contact me with this email
information .. roserose@fastermail.com
or rose11@takemail.com
Thanking you for your anticipated response.
Mrs. Roseline Ogugua.
^ permalink raw reply
* More SPAM in Netdev?
From: Alejandro Bonilla @ 2005-08-12 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Hi, Is it me or we are getting much more spam? (The ones with Chinesse
letters?)
.Alejandro
^ permalink raw reply
* °£´ÜÈ÷ ¹ßÁö¾ÐÀ¸·ÎÀÎÇØ ½ºÆ®·¹½º¸¦ÇعæÇϼ¼¿ä
From: Áö¾Ð @ 2005-08-12 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cvs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1328 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
- recent:[subjects (threaded)|topics (new)|topics (active)]
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox