* good day
From: Deper Gray @ 2005-12-19 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
The President/CEO,
Dear Sir/Madam,
I on behalf of my colleagues from different Federal Government of Nigeria
owned Establishments decided to solicit your assistance as regard transfer
of the above mentioned amounts into your bank account. This fund arose from
over-invoicing of various contracts awarded in my Establishment to certain
foreign contractors sometimes ago.
We as holders of sensitive position in our various establishments were
mandated by the Federal Government to scrutinize all payments made to
certain foreign contractors and we discover that some of the contract they
executed, were grossly over-invoiced either by omission or commission. Also
we discovered that the sum of US$33.6M (Thirty-three Million Six Hundred
Thousand U.S. dollars) was lying fallow in a suspense account
although the foreign contractors were fully paid their contract
entitlement after executing the said contracts.
We all agreed that the over-invoiced amount be transferred (for our own use)
into a bank account provided by a foreign partner, because we are government
workers and the code of conduct does not allow us to run or operate foreign
accounts.
However, we have succeeded in transferring some of this over-invoiced money,
precisely $5.0M (Five Million U.S. Dollars only) into a foreign account in
Beirut -Lebanon but the provider of the account in Beirut Lebanon is up to
some mischief and refuses to comply with our earlier mutual agreement
insisting that the total amount be transferred into his nominated bank
account before disbursement will take effect.
If for a meager U.S$5.0M (Five Million Dollars only) we are not
compensated based on the terms of agreement, is it when US$28.6M
(twenty-Eight Million, Six Hundred Thousand U.S Dollars only) is transferred
that we will be sure of our full compensation?
We are therefore seeking your assistance so that the remaining amount of
U.S$28.6M can be speedily processed and fully remitted into your nominated
bank account. On successful remittance of the fund into your account, you
will be compensated with 30% of the amount for your assistance
and services.
So far, much have been said and due to our sensitive positions, we cannot
afford a slip in this transaction, neither can we give out our identity, as
regards our respective offices, but when relationship is established and
smooth operation commences, you will be furnished with details of all you
deserve to know.
I am at your disposition to entertain any question(s) with respect to this
transaction so contact me immediately through E-mail for further information
on the requirement and procedure for this transaction.
Please treat with strictest confidentiality.
Waiting for your response.
Thanks,
Dr.Gray Deper.
^ permalink raw reply
* good day
From: Deper Gray @ 2005-12-19 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
The President/CEO,
Dear Sir/Madam,
I on behalf of my colleagues from different Federal Government of Nigeria
owned Establishments decided to solicit your assistance as regard transfer
of the above mentioned amounts into your bank account. This fund arose from
over-invoicing of various contracts awarded in my Establishment to certain
foreign contractors sometimes ago.
We as holders of sensitive position in our various establishments were
mandated by the Federal Government to scrutinize all payments made to
certain foreign contractors and we discover that some of the contract they
executed, were grossly over-invoiced either by omission or commission. Also
we discovered that the sum of US$33.6M (Thirty-three Million Six Hundred
Thousand U.S. dollars) was lying fallow in a suspense account
although the foreign contractors were fully paid their contract
entitlement after executing the said contracts.
We all agreed that the over-invoiced amount be transferred (for our own use)
into a bank account provided by a foreign partner, because we are government
workers and the code of conduct does not allow us to run or operate foreign
accounts.
However, we have succeeded in transferring some of this over-invoiced money,
precisely $5.0M (Five Million U.S. Dollars only) into a foreign account in
Beirut -Lebanon but the provider of the account in Beirut Lebanon is up to
some mischief and refuses to comply with our earlier mutual agreement
insisting that the total amount be transferred into his nominated bank
account before disbursement will take effect.
If for a meager U.S$5.0M (Five Million Dollars only) we are not
compensated based on the terms of agreement, is it when US$28.6M
(twenty-Eight Million, Six Hundred Thousand U.S Dollars only) is transferred
that we will be sure of our full compensation?
We are therefore seeking your assistance so that the remaining amount of
U.S$28.6M can be speedily processed and fully remitted into your nominated
bank account. On successful remittance of the fund into your account, you
will be compensated with 30% of the amount for your assistance
and services.
So far, much have been said and due to our sensitive positions, we cannot
afford a slip in this transaction, neither can we give out our identity, as
regards our respective offices, but when relationship is established and
smooth operation commences, you will be furnished with details of all you
deserve to know.
I am at your disposition to entertain any question(s) with respect to this
transaction so contact me immediately through E-mail for further information
on the requirement and procedure for this transaction.
Please treat with strictest confidentiality.
Waiting for your response.
Thanks,
Dr.Gray Deper.
^ permalink raw reply
* good day
From: Deper Gray @ 2005-12-19 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
The President/CEO,
Dear Sir/Madam,
I on behalf of my colleagues from different Federal Government of Nigeria
owned Establishments decided to solicit your assistance as regard transfer
of the above mentioned amounts into your bank account. This fund arose from
over-invoicing of various contracts awarded in my Establishment to certain
foreign contractors sometimes ago.
We as holders of sensitive position in our various establishments were
mandated by the Federal Government to scrutinize all payments made to
certain foreign contractors and we discover that some of the contract they
executed, were grossly over-invoiced either by omission or commission. Also
we discovered that the sum of US$33.6M (Thirty-three Million Six Hundred
Thousand U.S. dollars) was lying fallow in a suspense account
although the foreign contractors were fully paid their contract
entitlement after executing the said contracts.
We all agreed that the over-invoiced amount be transferred (for our own use)
into a bank account provided by a foreign partner, because we are government
workers and the code of conduct does not allow us to run or operate foreign
accounts.
However, we have succeeded in transferring some of this over-invoiced money,
precisely $5.0M (Five Million U.S. Dollars only) into a foreign account in
Beirut -Lebanon but the provider of the account in Beirut Lebanon is up to
some mischief and refuses to comply with our earlier mutual agreement
insisting that the total amount be transferred into his nominated bank
account before disbursement will take effect.
If for a meager U.S$5.0M (Five Million Dollars only) we are not
compensated based on the terms of agreement, is it when US$28.6M
(twenty-Eight Million, Six Hundred Thousand U.S Dollars only) is transferred
that we will be sure of our full compensation?
We are therefore seeking your assistance so that the remaining amount of
U.S$28.6M can be speedily processed and fully remitted into your nominated
bank account. On successful remittance of the fund into your account, you
will be compensated with 30% of the amount for your assistance
and services.
So far, much have been said and due to our sensitive positions, we cannot
afford a slip in this transaction, neither can we give out our identity, as
regards our respective offices, but when relationship is established and
smooth operation commences, you will be furnished with details of all you
deserve to know.
I am at your disposition to entertain any question(s) with respect to this
transaction so contact me immediately through E-mail for further information
on the requirement and procedure for this transaction.
Please treat with strictest confidentiality.
Waiting for your response.
Thanks,
Dr.Gray Deper.
^ permalink raw reply
* good day
From: Deper Gray @ 2005-12-19 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
The President/CEO,
Dear Sir/Madam,
I on behalf of my colleagues from different Federal Government of Nigeria
owned Establishments decided to solicit your assistance as regard transfer
of the above mentioned amounts into your bank account. This fund arose from
over-invoicing of various contracts awarded in my Establishment to certain
foreign contractors sometimes ago.
We as holders of sensitive position in our various establishments were
mandated by the Federal Government to scrutinize all payments made to
certain foreign contractors and we discover that some of the contract they
executed, were grossly over-invoiced either by omission or commission. Also
we discovered that the sum of US$33.6M (Thirty-three Million Six Hundred
Thousand U.S. dollars) was lying fallow in a suspense account
although the foreign contractors were fully paid their contract
entitlement after executing the said contracts.
We all agreed that the over-invoiced amount be transferred (for our own use)
into a bank account provided by a foreign partner, because we are government
workers and the code of conduct does not allow us to run or operate foreign
accounts.
However, we have succeeded in transferring some of this over-invoiced money,
precisely $5.0M (Five Million U.S. Dollars only) into a foreign account in
Beirut -Lebanon but the provider of the account in Beirut Lebanon is up to
some mischief and refuses to comply with our earlier mutual agreement
insisting that the total amount be transferred into his nominated bank
account before disbursement will take effect.
If for a meager U.S$5.0M (Five Million Dollars only) we are not
compensated based on the terms of agreement, is it when US$28.6M
(twenty-Eight Million, Six Hundred Thousand U.S Dollars only) is transferred
that we will be sure of our full compensation?
We are therefore seeking your assistance so that the remaining amount of
U.S$28.6M can be speedily processed and fully remitted into your nominated
bank account. On successful remittance of the fund into your account, you
will be compensated with 30% of the amount for your assistance
and services.
So far, much have been said and due to our sensitive positions, we cannot
afford a slip in this transaction, neither can we give out our identity, as
regards our respective offices, but when relationship is established and
smooth operation commences, you will be furnished with details of all you
deserve to know.
I am at your disposition to entertain any question(s) with respect to this
transaction so contact me immediately through E-mail for further information
on the requirement and procedure for this transaction.
Please treat with strictest confidentiality.
Waiting for your response.
Thanks,
Dr.Gray Deper.
^ permalink raw reply
* good day
From: Deper Gray @ 2005-12-19 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
The President/CEO,
Dear Sir/Madam,
I on behalf of my colleagues from different Federal Government of Nigeria
owned Establishments decided to solicit your assistance as regard transfer
of the above mentioned amounts into your bank account. This fund arose from
over-invoicing of various contracts awarded in my Establishment to certain
foreign contractors sometimes ago.
We as holders of sensitive position in our various establishments were
mandated by the Federal Government to scrutinize all payments made to
certain foreign contractors and we discover that some of the contract they
executed, were grossly over-invoiced either by omission or commission. Also
we discovered that the sum of US$33.6M (Thirty-three Million Six Hundred
Thousand U.S. dollars) was lying fallow in a suspense account
although the foreign contractors were fully paid their contract
entitlement after executing the said contracts.
We all agreed that the over-invoiced amount be transferred (for our own use)
into a bank account provided by a foreign partner, because we are government
workers and the code of conduct does not allow us to run or operate foreign
accounts.
However, we have succeeded in transferring some of this over-invoiced money,
precisely $5.0M (Five Million U.S. Dollars only) into a foreign account in
Beirut -Lebanon but the provider of the account in Beirut Lebanon is up to
some mischief and refuses to comply with our earlier mutual agreement
insisting that the total amount be transferred into his nominated bank
account before disbursement will take effect.
If for a meager U.S$5.0M (Five Million Dollars only) we are not
compensated based on the terms of agreement, is it when US$28.6M
(twenty-Eight Million, Six Hundred Thousand U.S Dollars only) is transferred
that we will be sure of our full compensation?
We are therefore seeking your assistance so that the remaining amount of
U.S$28.6M can be speedily processed and fully remitted into your nominated
bank account. On successful remittance of the fund into your account, you
will be compensated with 30% of the amount for your assistance
and services.
So far, much have been said and due to our sensitive positions, we cannot
afford a slip in this transaction, neither can we give out our identity, as
regards our respective offices, but when relationship is established and
smooth operation commences, you will be furnished with details of all you
deserve to know.
I am at your disposition to entertain any question(s) with respect to this
transaction so contact me immediately through E-mail for further information
on the requirement and procedure for this transaction.
Please treat with strictest confidentiality.
Waiting for your response.
Thanks,
Dr.Gray Deper.
^ permalink raw reply
* good day
From: Deper Gray @ 2005-12-19 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
The President/CEO,
Dear Sir/Madam,
I on behalf of my colleagues from different Federal Government of Nigeria
owned Establishments decided to solicit your assistance as regard transfer
of the above mentioned amounts into your bank account. This fund arose from
over-invoicing of various contracts awarded in my Establishment to certain
foreign contractors sometimes ago.
We as holders of sensitive position in our various establishments were
mandated by the Federal Government to scrutinize all payments made to
certain foreign contractors and we discover that some of the contract they
executed, were grossly over-invoiced either by omission or commission. Also
we discovered that the sum of US$33.6M (Thirty-three Million Six Hundred
Thousand U.S. dollars) was lying fallow in a suspense account
although the foreign contractors were fully paid their contract
entitlement after executing the said contracts.
We all agreed that the over-invoiced amount be transferred (for our own use)
into a bank account provided by a foreign partner, because we are government
workers and the code of conduct does not allow us to run or operate foreign
accounts.
However, we have succeeded in transferring some of this over-invoiced money,
precisely $5.0M (Five Million U.S. Dollars only) into a foreign account in
Beirut -Lebanon but the provider of the account in Beirut Lebanon is up to
some mischief and refuses to comply with our earlier mutual agreement
insisting that the total amount be transferred into his nominated bank
account before disbursement will take effect.
If for a meager U.S$5.0M (Five Million Dollars only) we are not
compensated based on the terms of agreement, is it when US$28.6M
(twenty-Eight Million, Six Hundred Thousand U.S Dollars only) is transferred
that we will be sure of our full compensation?
We are therefore seeking your assistance so that the remaining amount of
U.S$28.6M can be speedily processed and fully remitted into your nominated
bank account. On successful remittance of the fund into your account, you
will be compensated with 30% of the amount for your assistance
and services.
So far, much have been said and due to our sensitive positions, we cannot
afford a slip in this transaction, neither can we give out our identity, as
regards our respective offices, but when relationship is established and
smooth operation commences, you will be furnished with details of all you
deserve to know.
I am at your disposition to entertain any question(s) with respect to this
transaction so contact me immediately through E-mail for further information
on the requirement and procedure for this transaction.
Please treat with strictest confidentiality.
Waiting for your response.
Thanks,
Dr.Gray Deper.
^ permalink raw reply
* good day
From: Deper Gray @ 2005-12-19 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
The President/CEO,
Dear Sir/Madam,
I on behalf of my colleagues from different Federal Government of Nigeria
owned Establishments decided to solicit your assistance as regard transfer
of the above mentioned amounts into your bank account. This fund arose from
over-invoicing of various contracts awarded in my Establishment to certain
foreign contractors sometimes ago.
We as holders of sensitive position in our various establishments were
mandated by the Federal Government to scrutinize all payments made to
certain foreign contractors and we discover that some of the contract they
executed, were grossly over-invoiced either by omission or commission. Also
we discovered that the sum of US$33.6M (Thirty-three Million Six Hundred
Thousand U.S. dollars) was lying fallow in a suspense account
although the foreign contractors were fully paid their contract
entitlement after executing the said contracts.
We all agreed that the over-invoiced amount be transferred (for our own use)
into a bank account provided by a foreign partner, because we are government
workers and the code of conduct does not allow us to run or operate foreign
accounts.
However, we have succeeded in transferring some of this over-invoiced money,
precisely $5.0M (Five Million U.S. Dollars only) into a foreign account in
Beirut -Lebanon but the provider of the account in Beirut Lebanon is up to
some mischief and refuses to comply with our earlier mutual agreement
insisting that the total amount be transferred into his nominated bank
account before disbursement will take effect.
If for a meager U.S$5.0M (Five Million Dollars only) we are not
compensated based on the terms of agreement, is it when US$28.6M
(twenty-Eight Million, Six Hundred Thousand U.S Dollars only) is transferred
that we will be sure of our full compensation?
We are therefore seeking your assistance so that the remaining amount of
U.S$28.6M can be speedily processed and fully remitted into your nominated
bank account. On successful remittance of the fund into your account, you
will be compensated with 30% of the amount for your assistance
and services.
So far, much have been said and due to our sensitive positions, we cannot
afford a slip in this transaction, neither can we give out our identity, as
regards our respective offices, but when relationship is established and
smooth operation commences, you will be furnished with details of all you
deserve to know.
I am at your disposition to entertain any question(s) with respect to this
transaction so contact me immediately through E-mail for further information
on the requirement and procedure for this transaction.
Please treat with strictest confidentiality.
Waiting for your response.
Thanks,
Dr.Gray Deper.
^ permalink raw reply
* Pls. Respond ASAP
From: Mary Musanga @ 2005-12-19 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
From: Mrs. Mary Musanga.
7130, Somerset West,
Western Cape.
South Africa.
Dear Sir,
With warm heart I offer my friendship, and greetings,
and I hope this mail meets you in good health.
However strange or surprising this contact might seem
to you as we have not met personally or had any
dealings in the past, I humbly ask that you take due
consideration of its importance and the immense
benefit it will be to you and I.
After careful consideration with my children, we
resolved to contact you for your most needed
assistance in this manner. I duly apologize for
infringing on your privacy if this contact is not
acceptable to you, as I make this proposal to you as a
person of integrity. I got your contacts through my
personal research and out of desperation decided to
reach you through this medium.
First and foremost I wish to introduce myself properly
to you. My name is Mrs. Mary Musanga, mother of three.
My husband, Mr. Jeff Musanga, died whilst on an
official trip to Europe last year.
After his death, I was contacted as next of kin by a
private security firm in Europe to come forth with the
Certificate of Deposit and claim a safety deposit my
husband has in their Vault in his name.
I went through his library collection and to my
astonishment I discovered a Certificate of Deposit for
the safety deposit with this private security firm,
and other documents relating to the safety deposit.
The safety deposit which is in a trunk contains the
sum of $18,000,000 which was generated from cash
payments from his business associates in the diamond
trade from Antwerp, Belgium. Though I knew my late
husband was in the diamond business, I did not have
the knowledge that he moved funds in cash.
This has came as a shock to me and my children, and we
have decided to have this fund invested immediately in
commercial and residential properties abroad as well
as profitable ventures, as no member of my family can
hold such a huge amount in our name, hence we
sincerely propose to you to render us your most needed
assistance in this regard.
If you agree to render us your assistance, your role
in this project will be to act on my behalf as a
trustee to receive the safety deposit containing the
funds from the Security firm. Though I believe this
transaction should be based on mutual benefit and
interest.
For your reliable assistance, we are offering you 20%
of the funds. I thank you in advance as we anticipate
your assistance in enabling us achieve this goal.
I will be working with you for a mutual conclusion of
the process and I look forward to a long lasting
business relationship with you.
Whether or not you are interested in assisting us
please let us know. This will enable us make
alternative plans, in the event of non-interest on
your part.
With warm regards,
Mrs. Mary Musanga.
^ permalink raw reply
* Registration_Confirmation
From: info @ 2005-12-19 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ex-smtp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 115 bytes --]
Protected message is attached!
***** Go to: http://www.tichy.ch.uj.edu.pl
***** Email: postman@tichy.ch.uj.edu.pl
[-- Attachment #2: reg_pass.zip --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 55536 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Your mail Has Won A lottery.
From: nasy kings @ 2005-12-19 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
Euromillion Español
Paseo De La Castellana
15-89, 28008 Madrid.
Spain Branch.
Ref. Nº: ES/007/05MAD.
Batch. Nº: GHT/2907/05.
YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS WON THE LOTTERY.
We wish to congratulate you over your email success in our computer
balloting sweepstake held on 30th nov, 2005. This is a millennium scientific
computer game in which email addresses were used. It is a promotional
program aimed at encouraging internet users; therefore you do not need to
buy ticket to enter for it.
Your email address attached to ticket star number (4-5) drew the EUROMILLION
lucky numbers 3-19-26-49-50 which consequently won the draw in the Second
category. You have been approve for the star prize of EUR € 667,248.26. (Six
Hundred And Sixty Seven Thousand, Two Hundred And Fourty Eight Euros. Twenty
Six Cents)
CONGRATULATIONS !!!
You are advised to keep this winning very confidential until you receive
your lump prize in your account or optional cheque issuance to you. This is
a protective measure to avoid double claiming by people you may tell as we
have had cases like this before, please send your winning ticket, reference
numbers and amount won information for processing of your winning fund to
our registered claim agent in addrres below.
Mr. Natalia Veta..
seguroagency@netscape.net
Avd. De Los Americas 46.
C.P. 28006 Madrid
Spain.
All prizes must be claimed within three weeks of your reply.
Best regard,
Mrs.Angela Jesusa.
( Promotion Director )
^ permalink raw reply
* Registration Confirmation
From: office @ 2005-12-19 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 107 bytes --]
Account and Password Information are attached!
***** Go to: http://www.w-4.de
***** Email: postman@w-4.de
[-- Attachment #2: reg_pass.zip --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 55536 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Your Password
From: office @ 2005-12-19 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-masters
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 133 bytes --]
Account and Password Information are attached!
***** Go to: http://www.hdi-tarifeonline.de
***** Email: postman@hdi-tarifeonline.de
[-- Attachment #2: reg_pass.zip --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 55536 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* SACK performance improvements - technical report and updated 2.6.6 patches
From: Baruch Even @ 2005-12-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, end2end-interest; +Cc: Douglas Leith
Hello,
I wanted to post an update about my work for SACK performance
improvements, I've updated the patches on our website and added a
technical report on the work so far.
It can be found at:
http://hamilton.ie/net/research.htm#patches
In summary: The Linux stack so far is unable to effectively handle
single transfers on 1Gbps with high rtt links (220 ms rtt is what we
tested). The sender is unable to process the ACK packets fast enough
causing lost ACKs and increased transfer times. Our work resulted in a
set of patches that enable the Linux TCP stack to handle this load
without breaking sweat.
Your comments on this work would be appreciated.
Regards,
Baruch
^ permalink raw reply
* Paris Hilton & Nicole Richie
From: postman @ 2005-12-19 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: smntp1234
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 152 bytes --]
The Simple Life:
View Paris Hilton & Nicole Richie video clips , pictures & more ;)
Download is free until Jan, 2006!
Please use our Download manager.
[-- Attachment #2: downloadm.zip --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 55536 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: SACK performance improvements - technical report and updated 2.6.6 patches
From: Craig Partridge @ 2005-12-19 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baruch Even; +Cc: netdev, end2end-interest, Douglas Leith
In-Reply-To: <43A7178E.4030808@ev-en.org>
Thanks for sharing!
I found the report fun reading in the sense that I don't know of many folks
who've worked on slow path performance improvement.
However, having written some of these kinds of papers in the past, I'll point
out that before it could be considered publishable, it needs a much clearer
explanation of the algorithms in the actual code and precisely how they
were modified. For instance, it wasn't clear to me if the SACK block
code walked the list of outstanding segments for each SACK block or walked
the list of segments once, checking all the SACK blocks (they are both
n*s algorithms, but the second algorithm will have decidedly better
performance due to locality and ordering tricks you can play).
Also, it was not clear why the revised algorithm grows as O(lost packets)
vs O(cwnd).
Thanks!
Craig
In message <43A7178E.4030808@ev-en.org>, Baruch Even writes:
>Hello,
>
>I wanted to post an update about my work for SACK performance
>improvements, I've updated the patches on our website and added a
>technical report on the work so far.
>
>It can be found at:
>http://hamilton.ie/net/research.htm#patches
>
>In summary: The Linux stack so far is unable to effectively handle
>single transfers on 1Gbps with high rtt links (220 ms rtt is what we
>tested). The sender is unable to process the ACK packets fast enough
>causing lost ACKs and increased transfer times. Our work resulted in a
>set of patches that enable the Linux TCP stack to handle this load
>without breaking sweat.
>
>Your comments on this work would be appreciated.
>
>Regards,
>Baruch
^ permalink raw reply
* [BUG][PATCH] e1000: Fix invalid memory reference
From: Jesse Brandeburg @ 2005-12-19 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: kaneshige.kenji, NetDEV list, Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
In-Reply-To: <439EA1F4.3000204@jp.fujitsu.com>
Thanks for the patch!
Jeff, if you would be so kind as to apply this, thanks...
This patch fixes invalid memory reference in the e1000 driver which
would cause kernel panic.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Dec 13, 2005 2:27 AM
Subject: [BUG][PATCH] e1000: Fix invalid memory reference
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Hi,
I encountered a kernel panic which was caused by the invalid memory
access by e1000 driver. The following patch fixes this issue.
Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige
This patch fixes invalid memory reference in the e1000 driver which
would cause kernel panic.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_param.c | 10 +++++++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.15-rc5/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_param.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-rc5.orig/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_param.c
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc5/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_param.c
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ e1000_check_fiber_options(struct e1000_a
static void __devinit
e1000_check_copper_options(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
{
- int speed, dplx;
+ int speed, dplx, an;
int bd = adapter->bd_number;
{ /* Speed */
@@ -641,8 +641,12 @@ e1000_check_copper_options(struct e1000_
.p = an_list }}
};
- int an = AutoNeg[bd];
- e1000_validate_option(&an, &opt, adapter);
+ if (num_AutoNeg > bd) {
+ an = AutoNeg[bd];
+ e1000_validate_option(&an, &opt, adapter);
+ } else {
+ an = opt.def;
+ }
adapter->hw.autoneg_advertised = an;
}
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Intel e1000 fails after RAM upgrade
From: Jesse Brandeburg @ 2005-12-19 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: c-otto; +Cc: linux-kernel, NetDEV list
In-Reply-To: <20051219195458.GA23650@carsten-otto.halifax.rwth-aachen.de>
On 12/19/05, Carsten Otto <c-otto@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> First the basic system specs:
> Athlon64 3500+ S939, Winchester
> Kernel 2.6.14.4, X86_64
> 4*1 GB RAM DDR 333, Dual Channel [before: 2*1 GB RAM DDR 400, Dual Channel]
> Intel Gigabit PCI (Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02))
> Abit AV8
>
> After upgrading the memory to 4 GB I noticed my e1000 did not work.
> dmesg shows:
>
> e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
> e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
> TDH <2000>
> TDT <2000>
> next_to_use <6>
> next_to_clean <0>
> buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> dma <13024c002>
> time_stamp <ffffd8c7>
> next_to_watch <0>
> jiffies <ffffe096>
> next_to_watch.status <0>
are you using 4096 tx descriptors? what is your MTU configured to?
I'm confused because it appears you have 8192 (0x2000) descriptors but
the driver only allows 4096
> e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
> TDH <2000>
> TDT <2000>
> next_to_use <6>
> next_to_clean <0>
> buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> dma <13024c002>
> time_stamp <ffffd8c7>
> next_to_watch <0>
> jiffies <ffffe28a>
> next_to_watch.status <0>
> eth0: no IPv6 routers present
> e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
> TDH <2000>
> TDT <2000>
> next_to_use <6>
> next_to_clean <0>
> buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> dma <13024c002>
> time_stamp <ffffd8c7>
> next_to_watch <0>
> jiffies <ffffe47e>
> next_to_watch.status <0>
> e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
> TDH <2000>
> TDT <2000>
> next_to_use <6>
> next_to_clean <0>
> buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> dma <13024c002>
> time_stamp <ffffd8c7>
> next_to_watch <0>
> jiffies <ffffe672>
> next_to_watch.status <0>
>
> ethtool -t eth0 offline:
> The test result is FAIL
> The test extra info:
> Register test (offline) 40
> Eeprom test (offline) 0
> Interrupt test (offline) 4
> Loopback test (offline) 13
> Link test (on/offline) 1
>
> I have two of these cards. Both run fine in my (old, 32bit) server. I
> tested with both cards with both systems. Only in my 64bit machine this
> error occurs - with both cards.
>
> Please tell me what to do. I have to live with the VIA onboard in the
> meantime and that is not the best network card...
well, lets work on what is occuring, because this should work just fine.
^ permalink raw reply
* Paris_Hilton_&_Nicole_Richie
From: Admin @ 2005-12-19 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ralf
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 152 bytes --]
The Simple Life:
View Paris Hilton & Nicole Richie video clips , pictures & more ;)
Download is free until Jan, 2006!
Please use our Download manager.
[-- Attachment #2: downloadm.zip --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 55536 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Registration Confirmation
From: webmaster @ 2005-12-20 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: listening
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 135 bytes --]
Account and Password Information are attached!
***** Go to: http://www.dynamicdancers.co.uk
***** Email: postman@dynamicdancers.co.uk
[-- Attachment #2: reg_pass-data.zip --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 55536 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: Intel e1000 fails after RAM upgrade
From: Carsten Otto @ 2005-12-20 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesse Brandeburg; +Cc: linux-kernel, NetDEV list
In-Reply-To: <4807377b0512191535i13d00b8chd97872b3e540e2b5@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1129 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:35:57PM -0800, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > TDH <2000>
> > TDT <2000>
> > next_to_use <6>
> > next_to_clean <0>
> > buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> > dma <13024c002>
> > time_stamp <ffffd8c7>
> > next_to_watch <0>
> > jiffies <ffffe096>
> > next_to_watch.status <0>
>
> are you using 4096 tx descriptors? what is your MTU configured to?
> I'm confused because it appears you have 8192 (0x2000) descriptors but
> the driver only allows 4096
I am not. My MTU is 1500. At the moment the error message is:
TDH <0>
TDT <3>
next_to_use <3>
next_to_clean <0>
buffer_info[next_to_clean]
dma <128d61202>
time_stamp <100026052>
next_to_watch <0>
jiffies <10002667c>
next_to_watch.status <0>
I can't reproduce the 2000 value.
PS: The problem does not occur with Knoppix 3.9.
Thanks for the help,
--
Carsten Otto
c-otto@gmx.de
www.c-otto.de
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Paris Hilton & Nicole Richie
From: office @ 2005-12-20 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: XPost
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 152 bytes --]
The Simple Life:
View Paris Hilton & Nicole Richie video clips , pictures & more ;)
Download is free until Jan, 2006!
Please use our Download manager.
[-- Attachment #2: downloadm.zip --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 55536 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Registration Confirmation
From: hostmaster @ 2005-12-20 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: XFreeMail
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 101 bytes --]
Protected message is attached!
***** Go to: http://www.bitgate.com
***** Email: postman@bitgate.com
[-- Attachment #2: reg_pass-data.zip --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 55536 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* Registration Confirmation
From: office @ 2005-12-20 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Z-User
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 115 bytes --]
Protected message is attached!
***** Go to: http://www.student.utwente.nl
***** Email: postman@student.utwente.nl
[-- Attachment #2: reg_pass.zip --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 55536 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply
* FORM: MR, JON KEVLIN
From: jon kevlin @ 2005-12-20 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
Re: collection of fund ($USD152, 000,000.00) under special
arrangement. Pardon me if I have offended you by contacting you
for such a big transaction through an ordinary letter which makes
it suspicious considering the type of fraud proposals moving
around the world today. However, I was advised to explain this
transaction to you on face to face meeting. I could not do this
because of the situation in the world today not being sure of
your reaction.
I am Mr. Jon Kelvin, a consultant and broker from Kingston
Jamaica. I was hired by a Japanese business man to broker an
investment deal between himself and oil company in Venezuela. This
deal was executed in January 1997 and matured for termination in
2001. On maturity, the Japanese businessman and the oil firm
decided to terminate the investment in cash to avoid payment of
investment tax which amounted to several millions of U.S dollars
to the America internal revenue service (IRS). A special
arrangement was made between a top Japanese banker working with
Japanese bank in New York,the oil company and the businessman to
terminate the investment in cash payment under a
fictitious name with an arrangement to change it latter with a
power of attorney which they prepared and handed over to the
top banker. I was directly involved, well paid and mandated to
organize and carry out
the deal. All the cash was withdrawn in august 2001 and
transported to Europe by direct bank vault to vault delivering to
a private diplomatic storage in Europe for safe keeping pending
the collection. The real content of the boxes were not declared
to the storage as it was delivered as personal family treasure
and diamonds. The code for the storage, secret codes for the
opening of the boxes and its keys were all handed over to
me.Mr. Takashi the New York business man was planning to go to
Europe by mid of November 2001 with me for the
collection when the unexpectedn happened in September 11th attack
on the twin tower which claim his life and that of the top
banker.
This left me devastated and confused as I have not yet handed
over the deposit details to the owner and the power of attorney
prepared fore the change which was signed was still with the
banker in his office which was also lost It was agreed with the
storage that the consignment would be collect on or before 12
months from the date of delivery. Since due date the diplomatic
storage manager has been calling me to bring or tell the owner
to come over for collection. My friend,
since then I have been looking for any reliable person to
collect these
consignment under special and well negotiated arrangement until I
got your email contact.
All the needed secret code and identification and collection are
all With me.
Be rest assured that this transaction has been well organized,
100% Safe,legal, risk free and should be kept very confidential.
Please, contact me for the way forward in this transaction. If
you think we can do this together in trust.
Email:jon.kevlin@email.ro
Reach me with your personal data as follows.
1. Your phone aand fax numbers.
2. Your physical address both corperate and
residential
3. Age, sex and marital staatus.
4. Position and name of office.
Expecting to hear from you soon.
Regards,
Jon Kelvin.
^ permalink raw reply
* Re: SACK performance improvements - technical report and updated 2.6.6 patches
From: Injong Rhee @ 2005-12-20 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'David S. Miller', baruch; +Cc: netdev, end2end-interest, d.leith
In-Reply-To: <20051219.132256.61038824.davem@davemloft.net>
I wonder the same. I wonder how this new patch by the HTCP folks
improves what we provided for the 2.6.x (which is currently
incorporated in the latest linux version). My recollection says that
this HTCP patch periodically crashes the system very often -- so we
could not run the comparison. BTW, this fast SACK path fix we provided
are just a simple clean-up and modification from the original Tom
Kelly's SACK code - so Tom deserves the full credit for it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of David S. Miller
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 4:23 PM
> To: baruch@ev-en.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; end2end-interest@postel.org;
> d.leith@eee.strath.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: SACK performance improvements - technical report and
> updated 2.6.6 patches
>
> From: Baruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>
> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:26:54 +0000
>
> > Your comments on this work would be appreciated.
>
> Ummm... how about the patches that fix this which are in the 2.6.x
> kernel already?
>
> Yes, it's not your stuff, but it was incredibly less invasive and
> probably works nearly as well.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
- recent:[subjects (threaded)|topics (new)|topics (active)]
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox