Netdev List

* [PATCH v3 6/8] net: thunderx: add mutex to protect mailbox from concurrent calls for same VF
From: Vadim Lomovtsev @ 2019-02-20 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sgoutham@cavium.com, sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com, rric@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
  Cc: dnelson@redhat.com, Vadim Lomovtsev
In-Reply-To: <20190220110225.9497-1-vlomovtsev@marvell.com>

In some cases it could happen that nicvf_send_msg_to_pf() could be called
concurrently for the same NIC VF, and thus re-writing mailbox contents and
breaking messaging sequence with PF by re-writing NICVF data.

This commit is to implement mutex for NICVF to protect mailbox registers
and NICVF messaging control data from concurrent access.

Signed-off-by: Vadim Lomovtsev <vlomovtsev@marvell.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h        |  2 ++
 drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
index 227343625e83..86cda3f4b37b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
@@ -329,6 +329,8 @@ struct nicvf {
 	spinlock_t              rx_mode_wq_lock;
 	/* workqueue for handling kernel ndo_set_rx_mode() calls */
 	struct workqueue_struct *nicvf_rx_mode_wq;
+	/* mutex to protect VF's mailbox contents from concurrent access */
+	struct mutex            rx_mode_mtx;
 
 	/* PTP timestamp */
 	struct cavium_ptp	*ptp_clock;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c
index da5986ca7bee..2332e3e95e0e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c
@@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ int nicvf_send_msg_to_pf(struct nicvf *nic, union nic_mbx *mbx)
 {
 	int timeout = NIC_MBOX_MSG_TIMEOUT;
 	int sleep = 10;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&nic->rx_mode_mtx);
 
 	nic->pf_acked = false;
 	nic->pf_nacked = false;
@@ -136,7 +139,8 @@ int nicvf_send_msg_to_pf(struct nicvf *nic, union nic_mbx *mbx)
 			netdev_err(nic->netdev,
 				   "PF NACK to mbox msg 0x%02x from VF%d\n",
 				   (mbx->msg.msg & 0xFF), nic->vf_id);
-			return -EINVAL;
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			break;
 		}
 		msleep(sleep);
 		if (nic->pf_acked)
@@ -146,10 +150,12 @@ int nicvf_send_msg_to_pf(struct nicvf *nic, union nic_mbx *mbx)
 			netdev_err(nic->netdev,
 				   "PF didn't ACK to mbox msg 0x%02x from VF%d\n",
 				   (mbx->msg.msg & 0xFF), nic->vf_id);
-			return -EBUSY;
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+			break;
 		}
 	}
-	return 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&nic->rx_mode_mtx);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /* Checks if VF is able to comminicate with PF
@@ -2208,6 +2214,7 @@ static int nicvf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 							nic->vf_id);
 	INIT_WORK(&nic->rx_mode_work.work, nicvf_set_rx_mode_task);
 	spin_lock_init(&nic->rx_mode_wq_lock);
+	mutex_init(&nic->rx_mode_mtx);
 
 	err = register_netdev(netdev);
 	if (err) {
-- 
2.17.2

^ permalink raw reply related