From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Top 10 kernel oopses/warnings for the week of December 21st 2007 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:57:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <476BA8AF.4060201@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marcel Holtmann , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" To: Arjan van de Ven Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38542 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758978AbXLUN5j (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:57:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <476BA8AF.4060201@linux.intel.com> (Arjan van de Ven's message of "Fri\, 21 Dec 2007 12\:51\:11 +0100") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Arjan van de Ven writes: > > Rank 8: __change_page_attr > BUG at arch/x86/mm/pageattr_64.c:176 > Reported 2 times > Reported this week for 2.6.24-rc5; history goes back to 2.6.15 There is no BUG on this line on 2.6.24-rc5. Since there are many BUG_ONs in this file it is unclear which you mean. Could you always include the version of the kernel where the actual oops in the line came from? Anyways there are a lot of third party modules who do strange things with c_p_a(), not always legal, so you might look up out for that pattern too. Perhaps report the out of tree modules loaded in the summary too? -Andi