From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:56:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029EDBE5@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: To: "Templin, Fred L" Return-path: Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35043 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754058AbXKJU4n (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:56:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029EDBE5@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> (Fred L. Templin's message of "Tue\, 6 Nov 2007 17\:16\:11 -0800") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org "Templin, Fred L" writes: > > +#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6_ISATAP) > + /* ISATAP (RFC4214) - router address in daddr */ > + if (!strncmp(parms->name, "isatap", 6)) { Modern distributions tend to have daemons to automatically rename network interfaces using SIOCSIFNAME. Not sure they would touch isatap*, but they or someone else might. I would be likely safer to not base your user interface on the name only, but use a flag or number somewhere else. -Andi