From: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Why was the /proc info removed from e1000 ?
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:29:25 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnb3ikqi.i0h.lunz@stoli.localnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3E388D19.4000004@candelatech.com
greearb@candelatech.com said:
> I just noticed in the latest changelog that the /proc support was
> removed from the e1000 driver? I always found this usefull...any
> reason why it was deleted?
shortly lower in the changelog, you'll see that the same stats are now
availble using the standard ethtool interface. I don't know whether you
need a new ethtool to make sense of the e1000 stats struct.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-30 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-30 2:25 Why was the /proc info removed from e1000 ? Ben Greear
2003-01-30 16:29 ` Jason Lunz [this message]
2003-01-30 16:51 ` Ben Greear
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-30 16:26 Feldman, Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=slrnb3ikqi.i0h.lunz@stoli.localnet \
--to=lunz@falooley.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).