From: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 04:19:23 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnb8kp6j.reg.lunz@orr.homenet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E010107D325@orsmsx402.jf.intel.com
scott.feldman@intel.com said:
> Robert, please post your -ro3 changes - I can't find them.
sorry, the -roX and -sfX notations are mine; i'm backporting everything
to 2.4.20 for testing and most of the patches have to be tweaked one way
or another, so I gave them all my own names to help keep them straight.
-ro1 and -ro2 come from Robert's posts here, and -ro3 is what you get
when you apply
ftp://robur.slu.se/pub/Linux/net-development/skb_recycling/e1000_pci_2.pat
on top of that.
> I'm pretty happy with this NAPI code for e1000. Next step is to get
> some more generic QA testing with NAPI and then port back to 2.4.x.
For what it's worth, I've subjected various e1000 chipsets to just about
every kind of synthetic load all the way up to the maximum theoretical
full-duplex gigE framerate for hours without a hiccup. I'm using
backports from 2.5 with the TSO stuff stripped out. Judging from my
apache logs and the emails I get, quite a few others have been using
those patches on 2.4 too, but I've received no real complaints.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-02 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-02 0:13 [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes] Feldman, Scott
2003-04-02 4:19 ` Jason Lunz [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-01 21:22 Feldman, Scott
2003-04-01 19:13 Feldman, Scott
2003-04-01 19:23 ` Jason Lunz
2003-04-01 22:40 ` Jason Lunz
2003-04-01 19:44 ` Robert Olsson
2003-04-01 17:47 Feldman, Scott
2003-04-01 18:57 ` Robert Olsson
2003-04-01 21:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-27 16:54 Robert Olsson
2003-03-27 17:10 ` Jason Lunz
2003-03-28 8:27 ` Robert Olsson
2003-03-28 17:32 ` Jason Lunz
2003-03-28 18:43 ` Robert Olsson
2003-03-22 18:47 Feldman, Scott
2003-03-22 20:28 ` Robert Olsson
2003-03-31 17:14 ` Robert Olsson
2003-03-21 14:46 Jeff Garzik
2003-03-22 15:34 ` Robert Olsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=slrnb8kp6j.reg.lunz@orr.homenet \
--to=lunz@falooley.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).