From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Herbert Subject: Re: [PATCH] rps: fixed missed rps_unlock Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:40:23 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1270503358.9013.38.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.35]:13097 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756439Ab0DEVk1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:40:27 -0400 Received: from kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.81]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o35LePQt015453 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 23:40:25 +0200 Received: from pwi2 (pwi2.prod.google.com [10.241.219.2]) by kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o35LeNUq031316 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:40:24 -0700 Received: by pwi2 with SMTP id 2so3989920pwi.0 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:40:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1270503358.9013.38.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: - > > Yes, and rps_lock()/rps_unlock() are not well chosen either, but no > clever names come to my mind right now. > input_queue_lock/input_queue_unlock ? > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet > > >