From: memoriaru@foxmail.com
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: mxl862xx: bound FDB dump walk by table capacity
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 04:32:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_C230526401C94D7F29DDACF76C712DA7330A@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179278688436.3134.7157929929766878085@kernel.org>
From: Zhang Hewei <memoriaru@foxmail.com>
Thanks -- reviewed both Medium findings against the tree. Planning a
v2; replies to each below.
[Medium] off-by-one in the capacity check: the fix is warranted, with
one nuance on the premise. The kernel-doc for @last says "Indicates
that the read operation returned last entry", which reads as last
being set on the response that carries the final entry -- under that
reading, a walk of exactly MXL862XX_MAC_TABLE_FDB_SIZE entries
completes before the check trips. If instead the terminal response
carries no entry (and still counts as a read), the current order
rejects a correctly ended full table. The public headers do not
settle which it is, so v2 moves the param.last test above the count
check and drops the protocol dependency entirely; the macro name and
the error message get reworded to "conservative upper bound" to match
the comment.
[Medium] is rejecting only bridge_id 0 enough: fair. INVALID_HANDLE
is referenced by the API docs but never defined or checked by the
driver, so if it is 0xffff (the MaxLinear GSW convention), a failed
allocation would currently be consumed as a FID. v2 rejects 0xffff as
well, and range-checks the id once the driver-side bridge limit is
confirmed. Duplicate-id detection: the cross-domain fdb_del
consequence you describe is real; I'll see how far validation can go
without inventing API facts that are absent from the public headers.
The Lows are accepted too: the comment hunk moves into patch 1, the
"growing kernel memory without bound" wording is dropped (reported
entries consume the fixed netlink dump skb and -EMSGSIZE aborts the
walk; the unbounded case is a device answering forever with entries
that are filtered out before the callback), Fixes: tags will be
added, and the self Reported-by trailer goes away.
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20261022200434.80182-1-memoriaru@foxmail.com>
2026-10-22 20:04 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: mxl862xx: bound FDB dump walk by table capacity memoriaru
2026-10-22 20:07 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-22 20:14 ` memoriaru
2026-10-23 20:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-23 20:32 ` memoriaru [this message]
2026-10-22 20:04 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: dsa: mxl862xx: reject bridge_id 0 from BRIDGE_ALLOC memoriaru
2026-10-23 20:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_C230526401C94D7F29DDACF76C712DA7330A@qq.com \
--to=memoriaru@foxmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox