From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: shortcut net_rps_action()
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:02:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u2h65634d661004190902lcd63436s5a817e6cf8ee27f5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271689653.3845.73.camel@edumazet-laptop>
>
> [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: shortcut net_rps_action()
>
> net_rps_action() is a bit expensive on NR_CPUS=64..4096 kernels, even if
> RPS is not active.
>
> Tom Herbert used two bitmasks to hold information needed to send IPI,
> but a single LIFO list seems more appropriate.
>
Yes, this patch is an improvement over that.
> Move all RPS logic into net_rps_action() to cleanup net_rx_action() code
> (remove two ifdefs)
>
> Move rps_remote_softirq_cpus into softnet_data to share its first cache
> line, filling an existing hole.
>
> In a future patch, we could call net_rps_action() from process_backlog()
> to make sure we send IPI before handling this cpu backlog.
>
Yes. I did some quick experiments last night and there does seem to
be some gains in doing this.
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 9 ++--
> net/core/dev.c | 79 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 649a025..83ab3da 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1381,17 +1381,20 @@ static inline int unregister_gifconf(unsigned int family)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Incoming packets are placed on per-cpu queues so that
> - * no locking is needed.
> + * Incoming packets are placed on per-cpu queues
> */
> struct softnet_data {
> struct Qdisc *output_queue;
> struct list_head poll_list;
> struct sk_buff *completion_queue;
>
> - /* Elements below can be accessed between CPUs for RPS */
> #ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> + struct softnet_data *rps_ipi_list;
> +
> + /* Elements below can be accessed between CPUs for RPS */
> struct call_single_data csd ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> + struct softnet_data *rps_ipi_next;
> + unsigned int cpu;
> unsigned int input_queue_head;
> #endif
> struct sk_buff_head input_pkt_queue;
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 7abf959..f6ff2cf 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2346,21 +2346,6 @@ done:
> return cpu;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * This structure holds the per-CPU mask of CPUs for which IPIs are scheduled
> - * to be sent to kick remote softirq processing. There are two masks since
> - * the sending of IPIs must be done with interrupts enabled. The select field
> - * indicates the current mask that enqueue_backlog uses to schedule IPIs.
> - * select is flipped before net_rps_action is called while still under lock,
> - * net_rps_action then uses the non-selected mask to send the IPIs and clears
> - * it without conflicting with enqueue_backlog operation.
> - */
> -struct rps_remote_softirq_cpus {
> - cpumask_t mask[2];
> - int select;
> -};
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rps_remote_softirq_cpus, rps_remote_softirq_cpus);
> -
> /* Called from hardirq (IPI) context */
> static void trigger_softirq(void *data)
> {
> @@ -2403,10 +2388,12 @@ enqueue:
> if (napi_schedule_prep(&queue->backlog)) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> if (cpu != smp_processor_id()) {
> - struct rps_remote_softirq_cpus *rcpus =
> - &__get_cpu_var(rps_remote_softirq_cpus);
> + struct softnet_data *myqueue;
> +
> + myqueue = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
> + queue->rps_ipi_next = myqueue->rps_ipi_list;
> + myqueue->rps_ipi_list = queue;
>
> - cpu_set(cpu, rcpus->mask[rcpus->select]);
> __raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
> goto enqueue;
> }
> @@ -2911,7 +2898,9 @@ int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_receive_skb);
>
> -/* Network device is going away, flush any packets still pending */
> +/* Network device is going away, flush any packets still pending
> + * Called with irqs disabled.
> + */
> static void flush_backlog(void *arg)
> {
> struct net_device *dev = arg;
> @@ -3340,24 +3329,33 @@ void netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_napi_del);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> /*
> - * net_rps_action sends any pending IPI's for rps. This is only called from
> - * softirq and interrupts must be enabled.
> + * net_rps_action sends any pending IPI's for rps.
> + * Note: called with local irq disabled, but exits with local irq enabled.
> */
> -static void net_rps_action(cpumask_t *mask)
> +static void net_rps_action(void)
> {
> - int cpu;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> + struct softnet_data *locqueue = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
> + struct softnet_data *remqueue = locqueue->rps_ipi_list;
>
> - /* Send pending IPI's to kick RPS processing on remote cpus. */
> - for_each_cpu_mask_nr(cpu, *mask) {
> - struct softnet_data *queue = &per_cpu(softnet_data, cpu);
> - if (cpu_online(cpu))
> - __smp_call_function_single(cpu, &queue->csd, 0);
> - }
> - cpus_clear(*mask);
> -}
> + if (remqueue) {
> + locqueue->rps_ipi_list = NULL;
> +
> + local_irq_enable();
> +
> + /* Send pending IPI's to kick RPS processing on remote cpus. */
> + while (remqueue) {
> + struct softnet_data *next = remqueue->rps_ipi_next;
> + if (cpu_online(remqueue->cpu))
> + __smp_call_function_single(remqueue->cpu,
> + &remqueue->csd, 0);
> + remqueue = next;
> + }
> + } else
> #endif
> + local_irq_enable();
> +}
>
> static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> {
> @@ -3365,10 +3363,6 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> unsigned long time_limit = jiffies + 2;
> int budget = netdev_budget;
> void *have;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> - int select;
> - struct rps_remote_softirq_cpus *rcpus;
> -#endif
>
> local_irq_disable();
>
> @@ -3431,17 +3425,7 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> netpoll_poll_unlock(have);
> }
> out:
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> - rcpus = &__get_cpu_var(rps_remote_softirq_cpus);
> - select = rcpus->select;
> - rcpus->select ^= 1;
> -
> - local_irq_enable();
> -
> - net_rps_action(&rcpus->mask[select]);
> -#else
> - local_irq_enable();
> -#endif
> + net_rps_action();
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_DMA
> /*
> @@ -5841,6 +5825,7 @@ static int __init net_dev_init(void)
> queue->csd.func = trigger_softirq;
> queue->csd.info = queue;
> queue->csd.flags = 0;
> + queue->cpu = i;
> #endif
>
> queue->backlog.poll = process_backlog;
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-07 18:42 rps: question jamal
2010-02-08 5:58 ` Tom Herbert
2010-02-08 15:09 ` jamal
2010-04-14 11:53 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: " jamal
2010-04-14 17:31 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 18:53 ` jamal
2010-04-14 19:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-14 19:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 8:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:22 ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 20:38 ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:45 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 20:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 22:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-14 23:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15 2:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 2:50 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 8:57 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 12:10 ` jamal
2010-04-15 12:32 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 12:50 ` jamal
2010-04-15 23:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 8:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:34 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-15 8:50 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 8:48 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 11:55 ` jamal
2010-04-15 16:41 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 20:16 ` jamal
2010-04-15 20:25 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 23:56 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 5:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 6:02 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 6:28 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-16 6:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 13:42 ` jamal
2010-04-16 7:15 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:27 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:37 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:58 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:21 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:34 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 13:49 ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:10 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 14:43 ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:58 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:48 ` jamal
2010-04-17 7:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 8:43 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 9:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 14:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 17:26 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 14:17 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: remove time limit in process_backlog() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 9:36 ` David Miller
2010-04-17 17:31 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-18 9:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 11:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 2:09 ` jamal
2010-04-19 9:37 ` [RFC] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 9:48 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 12:28 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 13:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 14:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] " Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 16:02 ` Tom Herbert [this message]
2010-04-19 20:21 ` David Miller
2010-04-20 7:17 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: cleanups Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 8:18 ` David Miller
2010-04-19 23:56 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Changli Gao
2010-04-20 0:32 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-20 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 12:02 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-20 13:13 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1271853570.4032.21.camel@bigi>
2010-04-21 19:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 1:27 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-22 12:12 ` jamal
2010-04-25 2:31 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-26 11:35 ` jamal
2010-04-26 13:35 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-21 21:53 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-16 15:57 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15 8:42 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=u2h65634d661004190902lcd63436s5a817e6cf8ee27f5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=therbert@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).