From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Changli Gao Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rfs: Receive Flow Steering Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 21:42:54 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1270559096.2081.35.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Tom Herbert , davem@davemloft.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f197.google.com ([209.85.223.197]:37527 "EHLO mail-iw0-f197.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753731Ab0DFNnO convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:43:14 -0400 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so2185794iwn.21 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 06:43:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1270559096.2081.35.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Eric Dumazet w= rote: > > 1) The need to add "rps_flow_entries=3Dxxx" at boot time is problemat= ic. > =C2=A0 Maybe we can allow it being dynamic (and use vmalloc() instead= of > alloc_large_system_hash()) Is flex_array better than vmalloc()? --=20 Regards=EF=BC=8C Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)