From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Changli Gao Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: speedup udp receive path Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:07:09 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1272010378-2955-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com> <1272454432.14068.4.camel@bigi> <1272458001.2267.0.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1272458174.14068.16.camel@bigi> <1272463605.2267.70.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1272498293.4258.121.camel@bigi> <1272514176.2201.85.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1272540952.4258.161.camel@bigi> <1272545108.2222.65.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, David Miller , therbert@google.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eilon Greenstein , Brian Bloniarz To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:35708 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933889Ab0D3SNZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:13:25 -0400 Received: by mail-pv0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 7so299691pvg.19 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:13:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1272545108.2222.65.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Eric Dumazet = wrote: > > Changli, I wonder how you can cook "performance" patches without test= ing > them at all for real... This cannot be true ? > I am sorry. But I wasn't against your patch, and I just wanted to understand the test result from jamal. It is my fault submitting a performance patch without testing them. I should not reply on code inspection for the performance patch. --=20 Regards=EF=BC=8C Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)