From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:56:24 +0900
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <un0pn9knb.wl@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
References: <20021010002902.A3803@edi-view1.cisco.com>
	<20021009.162438.82081593.davem@redhat.com>
	<uu1jv9o3j.wl@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
	<20021009.164504.28085695.davem@redhat.com>
	<ur8ez9n8d.wl@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
	<20021010010439.C8102@edi-view1.cisco.com>
	<uptuj9mkq.wl@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
	<20021010012108.E8102@edi-view1.cisco.com>
	<uofa39lm9.wl@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
   netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021010014237.F8102@edi-view1.cisco.com>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

At Thu, 10 Oct 2002 01:42:37 +0100,
Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com> wrote:

> Well what do you know?  At least one implementation supports that type of
> config.

???
I can underdtand there is no interoperability issue with cisco box
(with /10 link-local prefix ?) and USAGI kernel(with /64 link-local
prefix). :-)

-- Yuji Sekiya