From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Andrey Jr. Melnikov" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv6: put autoconf routes into per-interface tables Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:21:36 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20170106153026.24785-1-lorenzo@google.com> <37df3b18-d17b-5875-7b44-db40be7b459c@cumulusnetworks.com> <161222cb-5c61-d016-bc0f-2453fb0408b7@cumulusnetworks.com> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from [195.159.176.226] ([195.159.176.226]:41860 "EHLO blaine.gmane.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932177AbdAJNdm (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:33:42 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cQwY5-0006Gl-VO for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:33:13 +0100 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Ahern wrote: > On 1/9/17 8:30 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:04 PM, David Ahern wrote: > >>> I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems > >>> that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would > >>> indicate that the code is not well-supported. Being unable to accept > >>> DAD is a pretty serious issue. Andrey, what version of the kernel did > >>> you see this on? > >> > >> Are you referencing an Android or google thread? This patch thread has not mentioned any IPv6 problems. > > > > No, this thread. I see message-ID 8cddkd-etc.ln1@banana.localnet in > > this thread. If you didn't get it, I also see it in the comments on > > patchwork - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/711956/ > > > Odd that I did not get that -- checked spam and trash. > Andrey is missing 830218c1add1da16519b71909e5cf21522b7d062 which tells me the comment is not based on 4.10 or net-next: > $ git describe 830218c1add1da16519b71909e5cf21522b7d062 > v4.8-14744-g830218c1add1 Good catch. I'm running 4.8 without this patch. Current 4.10-rc works. Sorry for noise.