From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuji Sekiya Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:41:52 +0900 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: References: <20021009234421.J29133@edinburgh.cisco.com> <20021009.161414.63434223.davem@redhat.com> <20021010002902.A3803@edi-view1.cisco.com> <20021009.162438.82081593.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: dfawcus@cisco.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20021009.162438.82081593.davem@redhat.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org At Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:24:38 -0700 (PDT), ++ David S. Miller wrote: > There are areas where the TAHI tests expect a certain behaviour > when more than one behaviour is acceptable. > > Great, that's what I was trying to find out. > > Now I just need to know if this link-local prefix case > is one such issue. :-) No, there is no test item in TAHI test that supposes link-local prefix is /64 :-) The reason we change the prefix length from /10 to /64 is following spec and adapting other imprementations. -- Yuji Sekiya