Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Willem de Bruijn" <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	"Max Krasnyansky" <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
	"Paulos Yibelo" <habte.yibelo@gmail.com>,
	"Chris Arges" <carges@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] net: resolve uncommon partial checksums at ingress
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 14:07:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.18c52b086550a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e66f7984fdeb8168e07fd7d0dad3deb8c30ead0a.1792067836.git.mst@redhat.com>

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> As reported first by Paulos Yibelo <habte.yibelo@gmail.com> (after which
> others, credited below, found more ways the bug can affect users) a
> virtio net header can place CHECKSUM_PARTIAL at any in-packet offset.
> If that state is retained, later checksum completion can modify the
> packet after protocol processing has made decisions from it.
> 
> Let's fix that: let's validate csum_start and csum_offset and only keep
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL when csum_start and csum_offset match a parsed TCP or
> UDP header, while handling VLAN headers, IPv4 options and IPv6 extension
> headers.  Complete other non-GSO checksums immediately, before any
> protocol processing runs.
> 
> We can't easily "complete the checksum" for GSO we don't recognize - GSO
> assumes knowledge of the protocol. We could segment ignoring the
> checksum then do whatever csum_start and csum_offset say, but that
> seems like an overkill for something that shouldn't happen.
> 
> There's some risk here:
> - non-gso packets which can't be parsed get checksum calculated in
>   software, adding performance overhead
> - gso packets which can't be parsed get dropped

The biggest risk I see of valid packets reaching this path is packet
sockets that are not bound to a specific protocol (ETH_P_ALL) over a
non Ethernet device.

Iff proto is 0 we could try to infer from the first nibble at the
network header:

+	iph = (const void *)(skb->data + nhoff);
+	if (!proto) {
+		if (iph->version == 4)
+			proto = htons(ETH_P_IP);
+		else if (iph->version == 6)
+			proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
+	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-15 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-15 12:41 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] more virtio-net csum hardening Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-15 12:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net: account for ingress-resolved virtio net hdr state Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-15 12:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] um: vector: honor virtio net hdr conversion failures Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-15 12:47   ` Johannes Berg
2026-10-15 12:52     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-15 12:55       ` Johannes Berg
2026-10-15 17:19   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-15 12:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] um: vector: trim skbs before verifying the header Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-15 12:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] net: resolve uncommon partial checksums at ingress Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-15 17:43   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-15 19:18     ` Chris Arges
2026-10-15 18:04   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-15 18:07   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-10-15 12:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] net: add a sysctl to opt out of virtio net hdr checksum validation Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-15 17:50   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-15 12:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] net: add ip4_parse() Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-15 18:51   ` Phil Sutter
2026-10-15 12:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] virtio_net: cleanup protocol calculation Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-15 19:21 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] more virtio-net csum hardening Chris Arges

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.18c52b086550a@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=carges@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=habte.yibelo@gmail.com \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox