From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>, jrife@google.com
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, yusuke.suzuki@isovalent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] udp: Preserve UDP socket addresses on abort
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 18:38:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.1f16f5ebde0ed@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260304212128.1943568-1-kuniyu@google.com>
Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 17:01:02 +0000
> > Currently, udp_abort() invokes __udp_disconnect() which clears out
> > socket fields like inet_daddr and inet_dport. This makes fields like
> > dst_ip4, dst_ip6, and dst_port useless inside cgroup/sock_release BPF
> > hooks following an abort on a connected UDP socket, since they'll always
> > equal zero. This differs from the behavior for TCP sockets where a
> > cgroup/sock_release hook will see the address and port that the socket
> > was connected to at the time it was aborted. This causes issues in
> > Cilium where a sock_release hook is used to perform map maintenance when
> > sockets are released, since Cilium actively destroys connected UDP
> > sockets in some cases.
>
> Just curious why Cilium does not unregister the socket just
> after aborting it ?
>
> At least Cilium should know the key at that moment.
>
>
> >
> > Make the behavior consistent between TCP and UDP sockets by not clearing
>
> This patch makes another inconsistency with TCP.
>
> As you mentioned in the cover letter, before the patch, even if
> aborted, a bound socket still reserves a port, but it does not now.
>
> This might be surprising for non-reuseaddr/port sockets.
>
>
> > out these fields in udp_abort(). Instead, just unhash the socket, mark
> > its state as TCP_CLOSE, and preserve the state of the other fields.
> >
> > Fixes: f5836749c9c0 ("bpf: Add BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_RELEASE hook")
> > Reported-by: Yusuke Suzuki <yusuke.suzuki@isovalent.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
> > ---
> > net/ipv4/udp.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > index b96e47f1c8a2..01a0a0fbcd56 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > @@ -3247,7 +3247,9 @@ int udp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
> >
> > sk->sk_err = err;
> > sk_error_report(sk);
> > - __udp_disconnect(sk, 0);
>
> How about passing another flag and avoid unwanted init only for
> bpf iterator ? This will need another layer of __udp_disconnect()
> like ____udp_disconnect() (I'm not good at naming), or must make
> sure the flag is never used in uAPI.
If the only goal is to not clear inet_daddr and inet_dport in
__udp_disconnect, then another variant of that that takes an extra
bool might indeed be the more obviously correct approach.
>
> > + sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
> > + sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
> > + sk_dst_reset(sk);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-04 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-03 17:01 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Preserve UDP socket addresses on abort Jordan Rife
2026-03-03 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] udp: " Jordan Rife
2026-03-04 21:21 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-03-04 23:38 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-03-04 23:52 ` Jordan Rife
2026-03-05 3:25 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-03-05 18:03 ` Jordan Rife
2026-03-05 19:31 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-03-05 23:18 ` Jordan Rife
2026-03-03 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Ensure dst addr/port are preserved after socket abort Jordan Rife
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.1f16f5ebde0ed@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jrife@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=yusuke.suzuki@isovalent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox