From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Alice Mikityanska <alice@isovalent.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Alice Mikityanska <alice.kernel@fastmail.im>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/12] udp: gso: Simplify handling length in GSO_PARTIAL
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 18:23:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.2005cee64b1e1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD0BsJVgvbmk5y5TKkeFcdMLj+VuCWisX4VXv9g15uu=5ddLVA@mail.gmail.com>
Alice Mikityanska wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing my series!
>
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 at 22:55, Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Alice Mikityanska wrote:
> > > From: Alice Mikityanska <alice@isovalent.com>
> > >
> > > Taking further the idea of commit b10b446ce7ad ("udp: gso: Use single
> > > MSS length in UDP header for GSO_PARTIAL"), simplify the implementation
> > > and fix the checksum (apparently ignored by hardware anyway).
> > >
> > > The mentioned commit started using msslen for uh->len, but still uses
> > > newlen to adjust uh->check. If the formula for check is fixed, newlen is
> > > assigned but never used before the loop, and newlen is overwritten after
> > > the loop. This makes msslen not really necessary, as we can reuse
> > > newlen, if we don't adjust mss before.
> >
> > That's a big if. Why is the udp length now set to the segment length,
> > and not to the GSO packet length, as before?
>
> Just so that we are on the same page: the behavior of the UDP length
> field changed in Gal's commit b10b446ce7ad, not in mine. You reviewed
> that commit and approved it:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/willemdebruijn.kernel.218d53621fba7@gmail.com/
>
> I'm just refactoring to simplify the code a little bit + fixing the
> checksum field that went out of sync with length after Gal's change.
> Hope that clarifies it.
Oh right. When respinning can you add this brief summary?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-07 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-26 20:15 [PATCH net-next v2 00/12] BIG TCP for UDP tunnels Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/12] net/sched: act_csum: don't mangle UDP tunnel GSO packets Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/12] udp: gso: Simplify handling length in GSO_PARTIAL Alice Mikityanska
2026-03-06 20:55 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-03-06 22:19 ` Alice Mikityanska
2026-03-07 23:23 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-03-07 23:34 ` Alice Mikityanska
2026-03-07 23:53 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/12] geneve: Fix off-by-one comparing with GRO_LEGACY_MAX_SIZE Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:20 ` Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/12] net: Use helpers to get/set UDP len tree-wide Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:19 ` Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/12] net: Enable BIG TCP with partial GSO Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/12] udp: Support gro_ipv4_max_size > 65536 Alice Mikityanska
2026-03-06 21:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-03-06 21:31 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/12] udp: Support BIG TCP GSO packets where they can occur Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/12] udp: Validate UDP length in udp_gro_receive Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/12] udp: Set length in UDP header to 0 for big GSO packets Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/12] vxlan: Enable BIG TCP packets Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/12] geneve: " Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-26 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/12] selftests: net: Add a test for BIG TCP in UDP tunnels Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-27 1:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-27 9:35 ` Alice Mikityanska
2026-02-27 18:17 ` [syzbot ci] Re: BIG TCP for " syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.2005cee64b1e1@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=alice.kernel@fastmail.im \
--cc=alice@isovalent.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox