From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, willemb@google.com,
petrm@nvidia.com, dw@davidwei.uk, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] selftests: hw-net: toeplitz: read indirection table from the device
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 18:12:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.224bdf2fac125@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251121040259.3647749-5-kuba@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Replace the simple modulo math with the real indirection table
> read from the device. This makes the tests pass for mlx5 and
> bnxt NICs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../selftests/drivers/net/hw/toeplitz.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/toeplitz.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/toeplitz.c
> index 7420a4e201cc..a4d04438c313 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/toeplitz.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/toeplitz.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
> #define FOUR_TUPLE_MAX_LEN ((sizeof(struct in6_addr) * 2) + (sizeof(uint16_t) * 2))
>
> #define RSS_MAX_CPUS (1 << 16) /* real constraint is PACKET_FANOUT_MAX */
> +#define RSS_MAX_INDIR (1 << 16)
Only if respinning, maybe also fix alignment of RSS_MAX_CPUS
> #define RPS_MAX_CPUS 16UL /* must be a power of 2 */
>
> @@ -105,6 +106,8 @@ struct ring_state {
> static unsigned int rx_irq_cpus[RSS_MAX_CPUS]; /* map from rxq to cpu */
> static int rps_silo_to_cpu[RPS_MAX_CPUS];
> static unsigned char toeplitz_key[TOEPLITZ_KEY_MAX_LEN];
> +static unsigned int rss_indir_tbl[RSS_MAX_INDIR];
> +static unsigned int rss_indir_tbl_size;
> static struct ring_state rings[RSS_MAX_CPUS];
>
> static inline uint32_t toeplitz(const unsigned char *four_tuple,
> @@ -133,7 +136,12 @@ static inline uint32_t toeplitz(const unsigned char *four_tuple,
> /* Compare computed cpu with arrival cpu from packet_fanout_cpu */
> static void verify_rss(uint32_t rx_hash, int cpu)
> {
> - int queue = rx_hash % cfg_num_queues;
> + int queue;
> +
> + if (rss_indir_tbl_size)
> + queue = rss_indir_tbl[rx_hash % rss_indir_tbl_size];
> + else
> + queue = rx_hash % cfg_num_queues;
>
> log_verbose(" rxq %d (cpu %d)", queue, rx_irq_cpus[queue]);
> if (rx_irq_cpus[queue] != cpu) {
> @@ -517,6 +525,20 @@ static void read_rss_dev_info_ynl(void)
>
> memcpy(toeplitz_key, rsp->hkey, rsp->_len.hkey);
>
> + if (rsp->_count.indir > RSS_MAX_INDIR)
> + error(1, 0, "RSS indirection table too large (%u > %u)",
> + rsp->_count.indir, RSS_MAX_INDIR);
> +
> + /* If indir table not available we'll fallback to simple modulo math */
> + if (rsp->_count.indir) {
> + memcpy(rss_indir_tbl, rsp->indir,
> + rsp->_count.indir * sizeof(rss_indir_tbl[0]));
It can be assumed that rsp->indir elements are sizeof(rss_indir_tbl[0])?
Is there a way to have the test verify element size. I'm not that
familiar with YNL.
> + rss_indir_tbl_size = rsp->_count.indir;
> +
> + log_verbose("RSS indirection table size: %u\n",
> + rss_indir_tbl_size);
> + }
> +
> ethtool_rss_get_rsp_free(rsp);
> ethtool_rss_get_req_free(req);
> ynl_sock_destroy(ys);
> --
> 2.51.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-21 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-21 4:02 [PATCH net-next 0/5] selftests: hw-net: toeplitz: read config from the NIC directly Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-21 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] selftests: hw-net: auto-disable building the iouring C code Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-23 0:55 ` David Wei
2025-11-25 2:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-21 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] selftests: hw-net: toeplitz: make sure NICs have pure Toeplitz configured Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-21 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] selftests: hw-net: toeplitz: read the RSS key directly from C Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-23 2:07 ` David Wei
2025-11-21 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] selftests: hw-net: toeplitz: read indirection table from the device Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-21 23:12 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2025-11-22 1:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-22 2:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-11-21 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] selftests: hw-net: toeplitz: give the test up to 4 seconds Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-21 23:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] selftests: hw-net: toeplitz: read config from the NIC directly Willem de Bruijn
2025-11-25 3:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.224bdf2fac125@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).