From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yw1-f170.google.com (mail-yw1-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEEBF35CBA9 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 14:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767797980; cv=none; b=lG54nNzT6kJsnQjRLNl9i8dLKAa4n5qPcRenHFctya/R4IgBzEoHXyOQCQ8feDGKOf8+ihD91b3gXOh7Y430404qtsNodl7OuDw0u7IGK8aq2bRU41UyB7n7JenwIgCYq8Vh2w4G+bknzgJH1FdbtqPxQRd1pqkWj7D3W9U7SZk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767797980; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/g+VPdf5RLxM3FpCwylvaiin4nBnMP86FjrQ2QeZu2c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=R+kddu12XYVwyoDFCiONFHLKyJZ5USK7lLurJ1UlWOvXFL7im83uJMeGl37ajmNlRYAmQ9aFXQi7CvkQJvvnfI7+mI+c3Zih2D09xf3qeJ6MURmLZ/8EdPcYPxEQ5IGpyYX56tG2B6OBowSrWYDzROIfOTsLHCU2X1iEXdCcyUI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=YMYUCLYq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="YMYUCLYq" Received: by mail-yw1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-790ac42fd00so16847677b3.3 for ; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 06:59:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1767797977; x=1768402777; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:references :in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ygEsBMOtQfOnd+ceAekCXMasHvVQy7UNaDcAc1PawvA=; b=YMYUCLYq2dJWMCKoC+oWjv27yM2iCKeBsMMNIcYPVJ9aPbwlMM8WtvDtWj38GIOR7M xIXoIb+anvUvL1HInj6BrdYuCF5TcEZ83PRLVED0/wPj8vrvYRE9dIWIUi+I5gXJ7wNJ AViT+KEm/wB9VJrs+ov9E65HzNnRdlQ+og0eR2x7lyu8sqQL3yBzaUrIHb1r616fPO7x oPDtFodb8sG1ZMTR1ERrrCuDDcGwr5h8NbNd2EFfakTSmajcIGGzWdIQ+e49NsF5kDel 9V8DXIIZVW1I+Dc2SGMPmO/uVJh8W8wGn+5gq8Rs8rMYPHfyt6KshxnKAgIs91C1d4d2 LJVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1767797977; x=1768402777; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:references :in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ygEsBMOtQfOnd+ceAekCXMasHvVQy7UNaDcAc1PawvA=; b=HDRKWHbmcDsL9J3OAP5Yb0qlqMi7n/xrM6T3YCiiviicRIOTj51f7u2Bw3NHy4tYgt wmbMIM5yoI7gIGYK0euBN6mSvximzKIZoyv6hY9r+2gY9F0Yc+DjyHudr8rfVQ6LnkMQ iMDMsBbti/qKAy1ZMo5Bc1fLb6LPAFutmvObORgqeDPSs9x16S+UlUDRsoiKMyIByoM0 zdYXxiWKXu8GrrcdbGOPVs0AecshUzawrTYxbMSsMRrfDwhYf4yqVn1sdR2Nl2tzI58F MhABBBEfX0X6b/WbSHgjn4jzh/cEqQtP3DdnmwIrHZ+uBCkaC7c8psQwdv4P+ttEBUJj DH1g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUADy0aJOGBqbH/kLgpG+7TeHB6poij0RGMCS1S/nZuytf3U+qWftDlJw/jE9lHT8kpUU9t1mU=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzxgd94e1oSVy627POf2ufkvVxGEo7d2/l8HA1l3WFtdLQBcxNX D0fxcX4bXqEkUcs2XQ/Uox9laW3EEzWFyWilAbdw/4LByerlzBR8Qr82 X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX6ijk68+3v+BR5MPIVQBXFZE+IO6XIPp1Mv9PXJ/3xXteHHGkwDmgYd+HjEaCU 2xN3/RH1plCEqwWzjTIf7z1DMormPvKlaSRaxiW5Iu/R1wjFbNhuThDS54lDXpNgthAV6HF7IbO CJHNE9VNxHWGqrTnxgfkKOgBOYvzhCslaOvGUqobB2fUcf56luGocJDciZbHJMj8vzs6YsKJ3X4 8HAUdaOR2PdMRN2TfrHxuybBJlUIOGpn8J+rxIm2Z3hvfWaerWZzV461FJd7v9mLZk87HA8nhXs qUKzTZtNDTcJfLgzed++aIflde0+Du8qWB32jhAlfBnQhVlJ1PW1a2BdhmWBmLmPGQiciHxTpdx yFzeSM6cTUOoT2DwQFxFMusNiqWLm5jTrHZ/ZxdXb7REycvExvmS8RYqCnI38if0OYMdkkYA+xk /7qt+VO3E/ab6J2+se602dkTeKsCW0moPl8qDWDtL25o6ruTfo3Q464tF+1Mo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGckZa869lQuPtJPN6tXowxLF91dFKwcfoBAPflAsajZxCtT4RbtUWJmXlz8CVoUJtC1vKmA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:315:b0:789:3166:25a7 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-790b5828b28mr57702757b3.46.1767797977574; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 06:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (250.4.48.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.48.4.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id 00721157ae682-790aa553750sm19318617b3.9.2026.01.07.06.59.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Jan 2026 06:59:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 09:59:36 -0500 From: Willem de Bruijn To: Xu Du , Jakub Kicinski Cc: Willem de Bruijn , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20260106145822.3cd9b317@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] selftest: Extend tun/virtio coverage for GSO over UDP tunnel Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xu Du wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 6:58=E2=80=AFAM Jakub Kicinski = wrote: > > > > On Tue, 06 Jan 2026 17:14:05 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > For instance, can the new netlink code be replaced by YNL, whether = in > > > C or called from a script? > > > > +1 looks like YNL is already used in net/ tests, and it supports > > the operations in question, so that's a much better direction. > > Please let us (YNL maintainers) know if there's anything missing > > or not working, IDK how much use the rtnetlink support in YNL is > > getting. > > > = > Thank you for the suggestion. I am looking into replacing the netlink > with YNL to reduce code. But after reviewing rt-link.rst, I found that > rt-link currently lacks support for VXLAN. Would more significant chang= es > to the patch be acceptable if I switch to Geneve to leverage YNL? These are only changes to the new code in your series. SGTM. I assume it is not a significant burden as the two are fairly similar. Is that correct? Eventually it may be nice to have VXLAN support in YNL akin to Geneve support. But sounds like a separate goal.