From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: mohammad heib <mheib@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, kernelxing@tencent.com,
kuniyu@google.com, atenart@kernel.org,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, fw@strlen.de,
steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: skbuff: fix truesize and head state corruption in skb_segment_list
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2026 18:58:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.26c920bcfc4bf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0684bf0a-c6eb-4d06-a054-dc9b4f97dbfa@redhat.com>
mohammad heib wrote:
> Hi Willem,
>
> You're right. I did a deeper dive into the callers and where the
> SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST bit actually originates.
>
> It turns out it is exclusively set in the GRO complete paths (tcp4,
> udp4, tcp6, udp6). Since these packets are built by the GRO engine for
> forwarding, the fragments are guaranteed to be orphans without socket
> ownership or head state.
When revising, please include my short note on relevant prior patches.
Also, let's self document these known invariants with
/* Only skb_gro_receive_list generated skbs arrive here */
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST);
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(nskb->sk);
> i will simply removed the truesize accumulation, as they are
> inapplicable to this GSO type.
>
>
> One thing that’s confusing me is whether I should remove the call to
> skb_release_head_state().
> This function updates reference counts for some fields in the skb, even
> when no socket is attached to it.
>
> So I’m wondering should I remove this call, or keep it as is?
> What do you think?
This was apparently introduced in commit cf673ed0e057 ("net: fix
fraglist segmentation reference count leak"). To handle a special
case for skbs with skb extensions. From that commit:
"where the frag skbs
will get the header copied from the head skb in skb_segment_list()
by calling __copy_skb_header(), which could overwrite the frag skbs'
extensions by __skb_ext_copy() and cause a leak."
So I read that has (1) this is still needed for some skbs (though the
only thing that is really needed is the skb_ext_reset(skb) call) and
(2) it is evidently safe to call unconditionally in skb_segment_list.
Same as previous, please include this context in the commit message.
>
> On 12/31/25 6:58 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > mheib@ wrote:
> >> From: Mohammad Heib <mheib@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> When skb_segment_list is called during packet forwarding through
> >> a bridge or VXLAN, it assumes that every fragment in a frag_list
> >> carries its own socket ownership and head state. While this is true for
> >> GSO packets created by the transmit path (via __ip_append_data), it is
> >> not true for packets built by the GRO receive path.
> >>
> >> In the GRO path, fragments are "orphans" (skb->sk == NULL) and were
> >> never charged to a socket. However, the current logic in
> >> skb_segment_list unconditionally adds every fragment's truesize to
> >> delta_truesize and subsequently subtracts this from the parent SKB.
> >>
> >> This results a memory accounting leak, Since GRO fragments were never
> >> charged to the socket in the first place, the "refund" results in the
> >> parent SKB returning less memory than originally charged when it is
> >> finally freed. This leads to a permanent leak in sk_wmem_alloc, which
> >> prevents the socket from being destroyed, resulting in a persistent memory
> >> leak of the socket object and its related metadata.
> >>
> >> The leak can be observed via KMEMLEAK when tearing down the networking
> >> environment:
> >>
> >> unreferenced object 0xffff8881e6eb9100 (size 2048):
> >> comm "ping", pid 6720, jiffies 4295492526
> >> backtrace:
> >> kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x5c6/0x800
> >> sk_prot_alloc+0x5b/0x220
> >> sk_alloc+0x35/0xa00
> >> inet6_create.part.0+0x303/0x10d0
> >> __sock_create+0x248/0x640
> >> __sys_socket+0x11b/0x1d0
> >>
> >> This patch modifies skb_segment_list to only perform head state release
> >> and truesize subtraction if the fragment explicitly owns a socket
> >> reference. For GRO-forwarded packets where fragments are not owners,
> >> the parent maintains the full truesize and acts as the single anchor for
> >> the memory refund upon destruction.
> >>
> >> Fixes: ed4cccef64c1 ("gro: fix ownership transfer")
> >> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib <mheib@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> net/core/skbuff.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> >> index a00808f7be6a..63d3d76162ef 100644
> >> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> >> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> >> @@ -4656,7 +4656,14 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >> list_skb = list_skb->next;
> >>
> >> err = 0;
> >> - delta_truesize += nskb->truesize;
> >> +
> >> + /* Only track truesize delta and release head state for fragments
> >> + * that own a socket. GRO-forwarded fragments (sk == NULL) rely on
> >> + * the parent SKB for memory accounting.
> >> + */
> >> + if (nskb->sk)
> >> + delta_truesize += nskb->truesize;
> >> +
> >
> > Similar to the previous point: if all paths that generate GSO packets
> > with SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST are generated from skb_gro_receive_list and that
> > function always sets skb->sk = NULL, is there even a need for this
> > brancy (and comment)?
> >
> >> if (skb_shared(nskb)) {
> >> tmp = skb_clone(nskb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> >> if (tmp) {
> >> @@ -4684,7 +4691,12 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>
> >> skb_push(nskb, -skb_network_offset(nskb) + offset);
> >>
> >> - skb_release_head_state(nskb);
> >> + /* For GRO-forwarded packets, fragments have no head state
> >> + * (no sk/destructor) to release. Skip this.
> >> + */
> >> + if (nskb->sk)
> >> + skb_release_head_state(nskb);
> >> +
> >> len_diff = skb_network_header_len(nskb) - skb_network_header_len(skb);
> >> __copy_skb_header(nskb, skb);
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.52.0
> >>
> >
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-01 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-31 2:54 [PATCH net v2] net: skbuff: fix truesize and head state corruption in skb_segment_list mheib
2025-12-31 16:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-01 22:24 ` mohammad heib
2026-01-01 23:58 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.26c920bcfc4bf@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=mheib@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).