From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
dongli.zhang@oracle.com, xmei5@asu.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tun: free page on short-frame rejection in tun_xdp_one()
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 20:05:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.28580e8a2708a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520160020.375349-2-bestswngs@gmail.com>
Weiming Shi wrote:
> tun_xdp_one() returns -EINVAL on a frame shorter than ETH_HLEN without
> freeing the page that vhost_net_build_xdp() allocated for it.
> tun_sendmsg() discards that -EINVAL and still returns total_len, so
> vhost_tx_batch() takes the success path and never frees the page; each
> short frame in a batch leaks one page-frag chunk.
>
> A local process that can open /dev/net/tun and /dev/vhost-net can hit
> this path: it attaches a tun/tap device as the vhost-net backend and
> feeds TX descriptors whose length minus the virtio-net header is below
> ETH_HLEN. Each kick leaks the page-frag chunks for that batch, and a
> tight submission loop exhausts host memory and triggers an OOM panic.
> Free the page before returning -EINVAL, matching the XDP-program error
> path in the same function.
>
> Fixes: 049584807f1d ("tun: add missing verification for short frame")
> Reported-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7
> Signed-off-by: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index b183189f1853..f594360d66d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -2394,8 +2394,10 @@ static int tun_xdp_one(struct tun_struct *tun,
> bool skb_xdp = false;
> struct page *page;
>
> - if (unlikely(datasize < ETH_HLEN))
> + if (unlikely(datasize < ETH_HLEN)) {
> + put_page(virt_to_head_page(xdp->data));
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
Make sense, thanks.
The error path from tun_xdp_act does the same. And the default: label
used to too, before a batching optimization was introduced.
Is the same then also missing if build_skb fails?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 16:00 [PATCH net] tun: free page on short-frame rejection in tun_xdp_one() Weiming Shi
2026-05-21 0:05 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-05-21 0:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2026-05-21 0:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.28580e8a2708a@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox