From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: mheib@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, kernelxing@tencent.com,
kuniyu@google.com, Mohammad Heib <mheib@redhat.com>,
steffen.klassert@secunet.com, atenart@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: skbuff: fix truesize and head state corruption in skb_segment_list
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 11:31:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.2dac63d32f3d9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251230091107.120038-1-mheib@redhat.com>
mheib@ wrote:
> From: Mohammad Heib <mheib@redhat.com>
>
> When skb_segment_list is called during packet forwarding through
> a bridge or VXLAN, it assumes that every fragment in a frag_list
> carries its own socket ownership and head state. While this is true for
> GSO packets created by the transmit path (via __ip_append_data), it is
> not true for packets built by the GRO receive path.
We have to separate packets that use frag_list, a broader category,
from those that use fraglist gso chaining. This code path is only
exercised by the latter.
> In the GRO path, fragments are "orphans" (skb->sk == NULL) and were
> never charged to a socket. However, the current logic in
> skb_segment_list unconditionally adds every fragment's truesize to
> delta_truesize and subsequently subtracts this from the parent SKB.
This was not present in the original fraglist chaining patch cited in
the Fixes tag. It was added in commit ed4cccef64c1 ("gro: fix
ownership transfer"). Which was a follow-on to commit 5e10da5385d2
("skbuff: allow 'slow_gro' for skb carring sock reference") removing
the skb->destructor reference.
> This results a memory accounting leak, Since GRO fragments were never
> charged to the socket in the first place, the "refund" results in the
> parent SKB returning less memory than originally charged when it is
> finally freed. This leads to a permanent leak in sk_wmem_alloc, which
> prevents the socket from being destroyed, resulting in a persistent memory
> leak of the socket object and its related metadata.
>
> The leak can be observed via KMEMLEAK when tearing down the networking
> environment:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff8881e6eb9100 (size 2048):
> comm "ping", pid 6720, jiffies 4295492526
> backtrace:
> kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x5c6/0x800
> sk_prot_alloc+0x5b/0x220
> sk_alloc+0x35/0xa00
> inet6_create.part.0+0x303/0x10d0
> __sock_create+0x248/0x640
> __sys_socket+0x11b/0x1d0
>
> This patch modifies skb_segment_list to only perform head state release
> and truesize subtraction if the fragment explicitly owns a socket
> reference. For GRO-forwarded packets where fragments are not owners,
> the parent maintains the full truesize and acts as the single anchor for
> the memory refund upon destruction.
Thanks for the report and fix. It can probably be simplified a bit
based on knowledge that only fraglist chaining skbs reach this path.
And the Fixes tag should reflect the patch that changed this
accounting in the GRO patch. Matching that in the GSO path makes
sense.
> Fixes: 3a1296a38d0c ("net: Support GRO/GSO fraglist chaining.")
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib <mheib@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/core/skbuff.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index a00808f7be6a..aee9be42409b 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -4641,6 +4641,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct sk_buff *tail = NULL;
> struct sk_buff *nskb, *tmp;
> int len_diff, err;
> + bool is_flist = !!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST);
This is guaranteed when entering skb_segment_list.
>
> skb_push(skb, -skb_network_offset(skb) + offset);
>
> @@ -4656,7 +4657,15 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
> list_skb = list_skb->next;
>
> err = 0;
> - delta_truesize += nskb->truesize;
> +
> + /* Only track truesize delta if the fragment is being orphaned.
> + * In the GRO path, fragments don't have a socket owner (sk=NULL),
> + * so the parent must maintain the total truesize to prevent
> + * memory accounting leaks.
> + */
> + if (!is_flist || nskb->sk)
> + delta_truesize += nskb->truesize;
> +
> if (skb_shared(nskb)) {
> tmp = skb_clone(nskb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (tmp) {
> @@ -4684,7 +4693,12 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> skb_push(nskb, -skb_network_offset(nskb) + offset);
>
> - skb_release_head_state(nskb);
> + /* For GRO-forwarded packets, fragments have no head state
> + * (no sk/destructor) to release. Skip this.
> + */
> + if (!is_flist || nskb->sk)
> + skb_release_head_state(nskb);
> +
> len_diff = skb_network_header_len(nskb) - skb_network_header_len(skb);
> __copy_skb_header(nskb, skb);
>
> --
> 2.52.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-30 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-30 9:11 [PATCH net] net: skbuff: fix truesize and head state corruption in skb_segment_list mheib
2025-12-30 16:31 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.2dac63d32f3d9@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=mheib@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).