Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jingxuan Xie <jingxuanxie@deeproute.ai>,  netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,  davem@davemloft.net,
	 edumazet@kernel.org,  kuba@kernel.org,  pabeni@redhat.com,
	 horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net 1/2] af_packet: retire TPACKET_V3 blocks without waiting for copiers
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 17:42:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.31ae9fde05c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028070528.139531-2-jingxuanxie@deeproute.ai>

Jingxuan Xie wrote:
> From: jingxuanxie <jingxuanxie@deeproute.ai>
> 
> TPACKET_V3 waits for a ring-wide read lock before retiring a block,
> while holding sk_receive_queue.lock. A copier keeps the read lock
> after reserving a frame and dropping the queue lock. On PREEMPT_RT,
> preempting that copier can therefore delay another packet path or
> the retirement timer until the copier runs again.
> 
> This was investigated after an approximately 355 ms block-retirement
> wait in a real PREEMPT_RT deployment. A QEMU ARM64 SMP PREEMPT_RT
> reproducer uses test-only instrumentation to delay one outgoing
> copier after reservation, with a second sender forcing retirement.
> The unmodified retirement logic blocks the second sender. The
> instrumentation is not part of this series.
> 
> Track FREE, ACTIVE, SEALED and USER state per block in private
> metadata. Reserve and complete copies under the receive queue lock,
> retaining the original block reference across the unlocked copy.
> Seal a full or expired block and try the immediately following block
> without waiting. Publish sealed blocks in reservation order once
> their copies have completed. Do not reuse a sealed block merely
> because its mmap status still reads TP_STATUS_KERNEL.
> 
> Limit each locked publication batch to eight blocks and continue
> ready backlogs on an unbound worker. Stop the timer and worker before
> freeing metadata. Check readiness using the last published block,
> and validate virtio headers before reserving a frame so an invalid
> header cannot strand an unfinished reservation.
> 
> Tested against that reproducer with both full-block and timer
> retirement: B completes while A remains delayed, blocks are not
> published early, and sequence numbers, lengths and payload match.
> An uninstrumented QEMU guest also passes psock_tpacket and
> psock_fanout. The accompanying KUnit suite covers the state helpers.
> 
> Keep the mmap layout and userspace status protocol unchanged. Ring
> exhaustion can still drop capture copies; a stalled copier no longer
> has to block retirement or copying into another available block.
> 
> The block producer index must cover the full unsigned block count,
> matching the independent publication index across large rings.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Fixes: 632ca50f2cbd ("af_packet: TPACKET_V3: replace busy-wait loop")
> Signed-off-by: Jingxuan Xie <jingxuanxie@deeproute.ai>
> ---
>  net/packet/af_packet.c | 319 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  net/packet/internal.h  |  27 +++-

This is a huge change. Try to solve the problem with a minimal fix.

The patch is doing more in one patch than needed. Such as moving when
virtio_net_hdr_to_skb is called. Probably for good reason but then that is
a separate change.

The main purpose can hopefully be achieved with less code churn too.

Try to avoid re-acquiring sk_receive_queue.lock, a regression. Batching
adds complexity and is probably not needed. system_dfl_wq runs as
SCHED_NORMAL, so this may introduce a new priority inversion.

Also: whitespace corruption, a confidential ("top secret") footer.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28  7:05 [RFC net 0/2] af_packet: asynchronous TPACKET_V3 block retirement Jingxuan Xie
2026-10-28  7:05 ` [RFC net 1/2] af_packet: retire TPACKET_V3 blocks without waiting for copiers Jingxuan Xie
2026-10-28 21:42   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-10-28  7:05 ` [RFC net 2/2] af_packet: add KUnit coverage for asynchronous V3 retirement Jingxuan Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.31ae9fde05c@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jingxuanxie@deeproute.ai \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox