From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, daniel.zahka@gmail.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] packet: use consistent header lengths in raw send paths
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:21:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.328be8a5ee86b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260726092110.80185-1-q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
Qihang wrote:
> packet_snd(), tpacket_snd(), and packet_sendmsg_spkt() read
> dev->hard_header_len multiple times while allocating and constructing an
> skb. Device reconfiguration can change this value concurrently, for
> example through bonding device type changes.
>
> For SOCK_RAW, packet_snd() can save a larger value in reserve and later
> allocate headroom using a smaller value. Moving skb->data back by reserve
> then places it before skb->head, and the following copy from userspace can
> attempt an out-of-bounds write.
>
> tpacket_snd() similarly uses independent values for allocation and for
> the skb_push()/skb_put() operations in tpacket_fill_skb(). The legacy
> packet_sendmsg_spkt() path also calculates its reservation and header
> offset from separate reads before dropping the RCU read lock to allocate
> the skb. A larger offset than reservation can move skb->data before
> skb->head, while mixed TX-ring values can also make
> copylen - hard_header_len negative.
>
> Read hard_header_len once for each send operation and use that value for
> RAW allocation and construction. The trigger requires racing an
> AF_PACKET sender with privileged netdevice reconfiguration.
>
> The separate SOCK_DGRAM consistency problem between hard_header_len and
> header_ops->create is not addressed here.
>
> Fixes: b84bbaf7a6c8 ("packet: in packet_snd start writing at link layer allocation")
> Fixes: 69e3c75f4d54 ("net: TX_RING and packet mmap")
Not sure whether a patch can have two fixes tags.
Maybe better two separate patches.
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Cover packet_sendmsg_spkt().
> - Limit snapshot-based calculations to RAW construction; leave DGRAM
> unchanged for a separate fix.
>
> Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260721084935.12312-1-q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com/
> ---
> net/packet/af_packet.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index e75d2932475a..d23898f24641 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -1953,6 +1953,7 @@ static int packet_sendmsg_spkt(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> struct net_device *dev;
> struct sockcm_cookie sockc;
> __be16 proto = 0;
> + unsigned int hard_header_len = 0;
Please keep reverse xmas tree ordering when not too inconvenient.
> int err;
> int extra_len = 0;
>
> @@ -1996,15 +1997,21 @@ static int packet_sendmsg_spkt(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> }
> extra_len = 4; /* We're doing our own CRC */
> }
> + if (!skb)
Why this branch?
> + hard_header_len = READ_ONCE(dev->hard_header_len);
>
> err = -EMSGSIZE;
> - if (len > dev->mtu + dev->hard_header_len + VLAN_HLEN + extra_len)
> + if (len > dev->mtu + hard_header_len + VLAN_HLEN + extra_len)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> if (!skb) {
> - size_t reserved = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev);
> + size_t reserved;
> int tlen = dev->needed_tailroom;
> - unsigned int hhlen = dev->header_ops ? dev->hard_header_len : 0;
> + unsigned int hhlen = READ_ONCE(dev->header_ops) ?
Why add this READ_ONCE? Other header_ops readers lack this.
> + hard_header_len : 0;
> +
> + reserved = ((hard_header_len + READ_ONCE(dev->needed_headroom)) &
> + ~(HH_DATA_MOD - 1)) + HH_DATA_MOD;
Now that this file uses this three times, it might be worthwhile
creating an LL_RESERVED_SPACE_EX(dev, hhlen) wrapper. And have
LL_RESERVED_SPACE call that. (optional).
>
> rcu_read_unlock();
> skb = sock_wmalloc(sk, len + reserved + tlen, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -2569,6 +2576,7 @@ static int packet_snd_vnet_parse(struct msghdr *msg, size_t *len,
> static int tpacket_fill_skb(struct packet_sock *po, struct sk_buff *skb,
> void *frame, struct net_device *dev, void *data, int tp_len,
> __be16 proto, unsigned char *addr, int hlen, int copylen,
> + int hard_header_len,
Inconsistent unsigned int above vs int here. Dev field is unsigned
short. Int is fine.
> const struct sockcm_cookie *sockc)
> {
> union tpacket_uhdr ph;
> @@ -2600,8 +2608,8 @@ static int tpacket_fill_skb(struct packet_sock *po, struct sk_buff *skb,
> } else if (copylen) {
> int hdrlen = min_t(int, copylen, tp_len);
>
> - skb_push(skb, dev->hard_header_len);
> - skb_put(skb, copylen - dev->hard_header_len);
> + skb_push(skb, hard_header_len);
> + skb_put(skb, copylen - hard_header_len);
> err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, data, hdrlen);
> if (unlikely(err))
> return err;
> @@ -2732,7 +2740,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
> void *data;
> int len_sum = 0;
> int status = TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE;
> - int hlen, tlen, copylen = 0;
> + int hard_header_len = 0, hlen, tlen, copylen = 0;
> long timeo;
>
> mutex_lock(&po->pg_vec_lock);
> @@ -2779,8 +2787,10 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
> goto out_put;
> }
>
> - if (po->sk.sk_socket->type == SOCK_RAW)
> - reserve = dev->hard_header_len;
> + if (po->sk.sk_socket->type == SOCK_RAW) {
> + hard_header_len = READ_ONCE(dev->hard_header_len);
> + reserve = hard_header_len;
> + }
> size_max = po->tx_ring.frame_size
> - (po->tp_hdrlen - sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll));
>
> @@ -2817,7 +2827,12 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
> goto tpacket_error;
>
> status = TP_STATUS_SEND_REQUEST;
> - hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev);
> + if (po->sk.sk_socket->type == SOCK_RAW)
> + hlen = ((hard_header_len +
Here and elsewhere: why special case this only for SOCK_RAW?
This complicates control flow.
> + READ_ONCE(dev->needed_headroom)) &
> + ~(HH_DATA_MOD - 1)) + HH_DATA_MOD;
> + else
> + hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev);
> tlen = dev->needed_tailroom;
> if (vnet_hdr_sz) {
> data += vnet_hdr_sz;
> @@ -2835,10 +2850,14 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
> vnet_hdr.hdr_len);
> has_vnet_hdr = true;
> }
> - copylen = max_t(int, copylen, dev->hard_header_len);
> + if (po->sk.sk_socket->type == SOCK_RAW)
> + copylen = max_t(int, copylen, hard_header_len);
> + else
> + copylen = max_t(int, copylen, dev->hard_header_len);
> skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&po->sk,
> hlen + tlen + sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll) +
> - (copylen - dev->hard_header_len),
> + (copylen - (po->sk.sk_socket->type == SOCK_RAW ?
> + hard_header_len : dev->hard_header_len)),
> !need_wait, &err);
>
> if (unlikely(skb == NULL)) {
> @@ -2848,7 +2867,8 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
> goto out_status;
> }
> tp_len = tpacket_fill_skb(po, skb, ph, dev, data, tp_len, proto,
> - addr, hlen, copylen, &sockc);
> + addr, hlen, copylen, hard_header_len,
> + &sockc);
> if (likely(tp_len >= 0) &&
> tp_len > dev->mtu + reserve &&
> !vnet_hdr_sz &&
> @@ -2956,7 +2976,7 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> int offset = 0;
> struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(sk);
> int vnet_hdr_sz = READ_ONCE(po->vnet_hdr_sz);
> - int hlen, tlen, linear;
> + int hard_header_len = 0, hlen, tlen, linear;
> int extra_len = 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -2996,14 +3016,17 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> - if (sock->type == SOCK_RAW)
> - reserve = dev->hard_header_len;
> if (vnet_hdr_sz) {
> err = packet_snd_vnet_parse(msg, &len, &vnet_hdr, vnet_hdr_sz);
> if (err)
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> + if (sock->type == SOCK_RAW) {
> + hard_header_len = READ_ONCE(dev->hard_header_len);
> + reserve = hard_header_len;
> + }
> +
> if (unlikely(sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS))) {
> if (!netif_supports_nofcs(dev)) {
> err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> @@ -3018,10 +3041,15 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> err = -ENOBUFS;
> - hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev);
> + if (sock->type == SOCK_RAW)
> + hlen = ((hard_header_len + READ_ONCE(dev->needed_headroom)) &
> + ~(HH_DATA_MOD - 1)) + HH_DATA_MOD;
> + else
> + hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev);
> tlen = dev->needed_tailroom;
> linear = __virtio16_to_cpu(vio_le(), vnet_hdr.hdr_len);
> - linear = max(linear, min_t(int, len, dev->hard_header_len));
> + linear = max(linear, min_t(int, len, sock->type == SOCK_RAW ?
> + hard_header_len : dev->hard_header_len));
> skb = packet_alloc_skb(sk, hlen + tlen, hlen, len, linear,
> msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err);
> if (skb == NULL)
> @@ -3037,7 +3065,7 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> } else if (reserve) {
> skb_reserve(skb, -reserve);
> if (len < reserve + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) &&
> - dev->min_header_len != dev->hard_header_len)
> + dev->min_header_len != hard_header_len)
> skb_reset_network_header(skb);
> }
>
> --
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-26 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 8:49 [PATCH net] packet: use a consistent hard_header_len in send paths Qihang
2026-07-21 16:01 ` Daniel Zahka
2026-07-22 14:26 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-07-24 3:36 ` Qihang
2026-07-25 7:39 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-07-26 9:21 ` [PATCH net v2] packet: use consistent header lengths in raw " Qihang
2026-07-26 15:21 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.328be8a5ee86b@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox