public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	 Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
	 Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>,
	 Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	 Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	 Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	 Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
	 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9] psp: support rekeying psp protected tcp connections
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 15:45:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.37bf21c78aadd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260204-psp-v1-0-5f034e2dfa36@gmail.com>

Daniel Zahka wrote:
> The PSP architecture spec specifies the need for rekeying connections
> in the event of a device key rotation. After a device key rotation has
> occurred, a new rx derived key needs to be generated and sent out to
> the other end of the connection sometime before the next device key
> rotation occurs.
> 
> Because PSP connections involve two different keys at each endpoint,
> one for decrypting ingress traffic, and one for encrypting egress
> traffic, there are two types of rekeying events that need to be
> supported. From the perspective of one endpoint of the connection:
> 
> 1. rx rekey: we need to allocate a new spi and decryption key on the
> current device key to provide to our peer.
> 
> 2. tx rekey: our peer has provided us with a new spi + encryption key
> pair which we should use for encrypting traffic immediately.
> 
> In the case of rx rekeying, there is a period where it makes sense to
> accept packets authenticated from either the previous or current
> spi. To deal with that we allow a socket to keep a chain of a max of
> two psp assocs at any time. If authentication state does not match the
> most recent assoc, the previous one will be tried.
> 
> In the case of tx rekeying, as soon as we install the new tx key, we
> have no use for the previous one, and it can be disposed of
> immediately.

So this defines a rekey event as an instant in time. An alternative
choice is to rekey at a specific seqno.

The difference matters only for retransmits.

Not sure there is a strong reason for either. But probably good to
state the choice explicitly.

> The only catch, is in the case where hw uses a key handle
> in tx descriptor state (as opposed to inlining the key directly). If
> this is the case, psp core needs to be sure that any of these
> unaccounted for references to key state are gone by the time it tries
> to sync a deleted key to hw.
> 
> To deal with this race condition, the series includes a driver api for
> implementing deferred tx key deletion, where the driver can signal
> back to the core when it is safe to dispose of old tx keys.
> 
> Lastly, some test cases for rekeying are included that go through key
> rotations and rekeying.

Still reading the code, first pass only.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-04 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-04 15:20 [PATCH net-next 0/9] psp: support rekeying psp protected tcp connections Daniel Zahka
2026-02-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] psp: support rx rekey operation Daniel Zahka
2026-02-07  4:24   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-07  4:32   ` [net-next,1/9] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] psp: move code from psp_sock_assoc_set_tx() into helper functions Daniel Zahka
2026-02-04 20:46   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] psp: support tx rekey operation Daniel Zahka
2026-02-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] psp: refactor psp_dev_tx_key_del() Daniel Zahka
2026-02-04 20:46   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] psp: add driver api for deferred tx key deletion Daniel Zahka
2026-02-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] psp: add core tracked stats for deferred " Daniel Zahka
2026-02-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] mlx5: psp: implement deferred tx " Daniel Zahka
2026-02-07  4:30   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-07  4:32   ` [net-next,7/9] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] selftests: drv-net: psp: lift psp connection setup out of _data_basic_send() testcase Daniel Zahka
2026-02-04 20:49   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-02-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] selftests: drv-net: psp: add tests for rekeying connections Daniel Zahka
2026-02-04 20:45 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-02-04 21:43   ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] psp: support rekeying psp protected tcp connections Daniel Zahka
2026-02-07  4:18     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-07  4:21 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.37bf21c78aadd@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox