From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Junnan Zhang <zhangjn_dev@163.com>, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
liuhangbin@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, sunshx@chinatelecom.cn,
zhangjn11@chinatelecom.cn, zhangjn_dev@163.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/packet: fix network header offset-VLAN raw packets on VLAN subinterfaces
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 12:26:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.388b632cadf16@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824173745.16757-1-zhangjn_dev@163.com>
Junnan Zhang wrote:
> Hi Willem,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> > > AF_PACKET SOCK_RAW reserves dev->hard_header_len bytes of headroom. For
> > > VLAN subinterfaces, hard_header_len VLAN tag space (18 bytes)
> >
> > Does it?
> >
> > vlan_dev_init:
> >
> > dev->hard_header_len = real_dev->hard_header_len;
>
> You are right that this is only true when VLAN hardware offloading is
> available, i.e. vlan_hw_offload_capable() returns true and vlan_dev_init()
> takes the first branch. The bug I am fixing only happens in the else
> branch:
>
> dev->hard_header_len = real_dev->hard_header_len + VLAN_HLEN;
>
> I observed it on a virtio_net device, which advertises
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER but not IF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX. So any VLAN
> subinterface created on top of it uses software VLAN tag insertion and
> has hard_header_len = 18 while min_header_len stays at 14.
>
> > > while min_header_len is the real Ethernet header length (14 bytes). When
> >
> > Which device did you observe this with?
>
> virtio_net (in a KVM/QEMU guest).
>
> > > userspace sends a standard untagged Ethernet frame through a VLAN
> > > subinterface, packet_parse_headers() only correct_header for
> > > VLAN-tagged frames. For non-VLAN frames it leaves network_header at
> > > hard_header_len, so the IP header is found 4 bytes too late and
> > > inet_gso_segment() fails with -EINVAL.
> >
> > Which path did you observe generating these untagged packets through
> > a VLAN interface?
>
> The reproducer is an AF_PACKET SOCK_RAW socket bound to the VLAN
> subinterface, with PACKET_VNET_HDR enabled. Userspace sends a large
> IPv4/TCP frame that exceeds the path MTU; the virtio-net header in the
> packet sets gso_type, so the skb goes through GSO. The userspace frame
> contains a plain Ethernet + IP + TCP layout, without a VLAN tag. The VLAN
> sub inserts the 802.1Q tag in vlan_dev_hard_start_xmit().
>
> Before the fix, packet_snd() leaves network_header at base +
> hard_header_len (18), while the real IP header starts at base + 14 + 14 =
> base + 28. network_header points 4 bytes past the IP header, so
> inet_gso_segment() gets a misaligned ip_hdr(skb) and returns -EINVAL.
Why is the real length 14 + 14 == 28?
Where does the second 14 come from?
> > > + bool has_vlan;
> >
> > nit: confusing variable, combining test on packet and device.
>
> Ag. In v2 I will restructure the function to test dev->type once and
> use a clearly packet-only variable. For example:
>
> if (likely(skb->dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER)) {
> bool is_vlan = eth_type_vlan(skb->protocol);
>
> if (!is_vlan && sock->type == SOCK_RAW &&
> skb->dev->min_header_len < skb->dev->hard_header_len)
This is the hint that this is a vlan device with software VLAN tag
insertion? Technically, it might apply to other variable length
header devices too.
> skb_set_network_header(skb, skb->dev->min_header_len);
>
> skb_probe_transport_header(skb);
>
> if (is_vlan &&
> vlan_get_protocol_and_depth(skb, skb->protocol, &depth) != 0)
> skb_set_network_header(skb, depth);
> } else {
> skb_probe_transport_header(skb);
> }
>
> > > + likely(skb->dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) &&
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 8:57 [PATCH] net/packet: fix network header offset for non-VLAN raw packets on VLAN subinterfaces Junnan Zhang
2026-08-22 19:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-24 17:37 ` [PATCH] net/packet: fix network header offset-VLAN " Junnan Zhang
2026-08-25 16:26 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-08-26 15:58 ` Junnan Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.388b632cadf16@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sunshx@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=zhangjn11@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=zhangjn_dev@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox