From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Nick Hudson <nhudson@akamai.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Nick Hudson <nhudson@akamai.com>,
Max Tottenham <mtottenh@akamai.com>,
Anna Glasgall <aglasgal@akamai.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] bpf: add guard rails for new DECAP flags
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:30:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.4f5a568542ec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317121429.2399539-5-nhudson@akamai.com>
Nick Hudson wrote:
> Add checks to require shrink-only decap, reject conflicting decap flag combinations, and verify removed length is sufficient for claimed header decapsulation.
>
> Co-developed-by: Max Tottenham <mtottenh@akamai.com>
> Signed-off-by: Max Tottenham <mtottenh@akamai.com>
> Co-developed-by: Anna Glasgall <aglasgal@akamai.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anna Glasgall <aglasgal@akamai.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Hudson <nhudson@akamai.com>
This patch probably should come before 3, as 3 enables the features
without the guard rails in place.
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index ac7e1068fe4c..437e0da34f84 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> #include <net/sock_reuseport.h>
> #include <net/busy_poll.h>
> #include <net/tcp.h>
> +#include <net/gre.h>
> #include <net/xfrm.h>
> #include <net/udp.h>
> #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
> @@ -3745,20 +3746,46 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_adjust_room, struct sk_buff *, skb, s32, len_diff,
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> - if (flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_MASK) {
> + if (flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_MASK) {
> + u32 len_decap_min = 0;
> +
> if (!shrink)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - switch (flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_MASK) {
> - case BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_IPV4:
> + if ((flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_MASK) ==
> + BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_MASK)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if ((flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L4_MASK) ==
> + BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L4_MASK)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if ((flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_IPXIP_MASK) ==
> + BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_IPXIP_MASK)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
Are these equality tests shorthand based on knowledge that each only
have two options, so equality implies more than one option set? That
is not obvious/self documenting. Please add a brief comment.
> + if ((flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L4_MASK) &&
> + (flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_IPXIP_MASK))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (mode == BPF_ADJ_ROOM_MAC)
> + len_decap_min += proto == htons(ETH_P_IP) ?
> + sizeof(struct iphdr) : sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
MAC is not a GSO related decap, can be used for insertion/deletion of
L2.5 headers. This should be dropped.
> +
> + if (flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L4_UDP)
> + len_decap_min += sizeof(struct udphdr);
> +
> + if (flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L4_GRE)
> + len_decap_min += sizeof(struct gre_base_hdr);
> +
> + if (len_diff_abs < len_decap_min)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_IPV4)
> len_min = sizeof(struct iphdr);
> - break;
> - case BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_IPV6:
> +
> + if (flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_IPV6)
> len_min = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
> - break;
> - default:
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> }
>
> len_cur = skb->len - skb_network_offset(skb);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260317121429.2399539-1-nhudson@akamai.com>
2026-03-17 12:14 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] bpf: add helper masks for ADJ_ROOM decap flags Nick Hudson
2026-03-17 13:27 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-03-17 13:47 ` Hudson, Nick
2026-03-17 14:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-03-17 12:14 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] bpf: add guard rails for new DECAP flags Nick Hudson
2026-03-17 13:30 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-03-17 12:14 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] bpf: clear decap tunnel GSO state in skb_adjust_room Nick Hudson
2026-03-17 13:02 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.4f5a568542ec@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=aglasgal@akamai.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mtottenh@akamai.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhudson@akamai.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox