From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
horms@kernel.org, Yiming Qian <yimingqian591@gmail.com>,
daniel.zahka@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: psp: check for device unregister when creating assoc
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:46:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.5279c14a2134@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326130459.7225ae28@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:40:00 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > @@ -320,6 +320,11 @@ int psp_assoc_device_get_locked(const struct genl_split_ops *ops,
> > > id = info->attrs[PSP_A_ASSOC_DEV_ID];
> > > if (psd) {
> > > mutex_lock(&psd->lock);
> > > + if (!psp_dev_is_registered(psd)) {
> > > + mutex_unlock(&psd->lock);
> > > + err = -ENODEV;
> > > + goto err_psd_put;
> > > + }
> >
> > This ensures that psd is valid for this caller of psp_dev_get_for_sock
> > and psp_dev_tryget, which is its only one (for now).
> >
> > But is it confusing that psd can be cleared out while a reference is
> > held? Is the assumption that psp_dev_unregister usually holds the last
> > reference and its psp_dev_put will complete the clean up by calling
> > psp_dev_free. If so, would it make sense to defer everything
> > to psp_dev_free?
> >
> > This is a simpler changes and fixes the issue for the only caller, so
> > LGTM. Just curious.
>
> Meaning we should add a dance around removal like netdev does?
> Sleep until all the references are gone?
> Subjectively I think it's ugly, and in netdev it didn't really
> prevent races. Dunno, definitely subjective.
Yeah, if any caller of psp_dev_unregister has to know that the device
is gone to proceed, it would require something like that. Okay, I see
that that is needlessly messy.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 20:51 [PATCH net] net: psp: check for device unregister when creating assoc Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-24 22:40 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-03-26 20:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-26 20:46 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.5279c14a2134@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yimingqian591@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox