From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.ord>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: fib: restore ECMP balance from loopback
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 15:54:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.5c4c191262c5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251213135849.2054677-1-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> Preference of nexthop with source address broke ECMP for packets with
> source address from loopback interface. Original behaviour was to
> balance over nexthops while now it uses the latest nexthop from the
> group.
How does the loopback device specifically come into this?
>
> For the case with 198.51.100.1/32 assigned to lo:
>
> before:
> done | grep veth | awk ' {print $(NF-2)}' | sort | uniq -c:
> 255 veth3
>
> after:
> done | grep veth | awk ' {print $(NF-2)}' | sort | uniq -c:
> 122 veth1
> 133 veth3
>
> Fixes: 32607a332cfe ("ipv4: prefer multipath nexthop that matches source address")
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> ---
> net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> index a5f3c8459758..c54b4ad9c280 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> @@ -2165,9 +2165,9 @@ static bool fib_good_nh(const struct fib_nh *nh)
> void fib_select_multipath(struct fib_result *res, int hash,
> const struct flowi4 *fl4)
> {
> + bool first = false, found = false;
> struct fib_info *fi = res->fi;
> struct net *net = fi->fib_net;
> - bool found = false;
> bool use_neigh;
> __be32 saddr;
>
> @@ -2190,23 +2190,24 @@ void fib_select_multipath(struct fib_result *res, int hash,
> (use_neigh && !fib_good_nh(nexthop_nh)))
> continue;
>
> - if (!found) {
> + if (saddr && nexthop_nh->nh_saddr == saddr) {
> res->nh_sel = nhsel;
> res->nhc = &nexthop_nh->nh_common;
> - found = !saddr || nexthop_nh->nh_saddr == saddr;
> + return;
This can return a match that exceeds the upper bound, while better
matches may exist.
Perhaps what we want is the following:
1. if there are matches that match saddr, prefer those above others
- take the first match, as with hash input that results in load
balancing across flows
2. else, take any match
- again, first fit
If no match below fib_nh_upper_bound is found, fall back to the first
fit above that exceeds nh_upper_bound. Again, prefer first fit of 1 if
it exists, else first fit of 2.
If so then we need up to two concurrent stored options,
first_match_saddr and first.
Or alternatively use a score similar to inet listener lookup.
Since a new variable is added, I would rename found with
first_match_saddr or similar to document the intent.
> }
>
> - if (hash > nh_upper_bound)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (!saddr || nexthop_nh->nh_saddr == saddr) {
> + if (!first) {
> res->nh_sel = nhsel;
> res->nhc = &nexthop_nh->nh_common;
> - return;
> + first = true;
> }
>
> - if (found)
> - return;
> + if (found || hash > nh_upper_bound)
> + continue;
> +
> + res->nh_sel = nhsel;
> + res->nhc = &nexthop_nh->nh_common;
> + found = true;
>
> } endfor_nexthops(fi);
> }
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-13 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-13 13:58 [PATCH net 1/2] net: fib: restore ECMP balance from loopback Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-13 13:58 ` [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: fib_nexthops: Add test case for ipv4 multi nexthops Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-13 21:18 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-12-13 21:26 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-13 22:02 ` David Ahern
2025-12-15 6:59 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-12-15 16:13 ` David Ahern
2025-12-15 19:01 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-13 20:54 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2025-12-13 21:22 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: fib: restore ECMP balance from loopback Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-15 21:45 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.5c4c191262c5@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.ord \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).