netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.ord>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,  Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: fib: restore ECMP balance from loopback
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 15:54:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.5c4c191262c5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251213135849.2054677-1-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>

Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> Preference of nexthop with source address broke ECMP for packets with
> source address from loopback interface. Original behaviour was to
> balance over nexthops while now it uses the latest nexthop from the
> group.

How does the loopback device specifically come into this?

> 
> For the case with 198.51.100.1/32 assigned to lo:
> 
> before:
>    done | grep veth | awk ' {print $(NF-2)}' | sort | uniq -c:
>     255 veth3
> 
> after:
>    done | grep veth | awk ' {print $(NF-2)}' | sort | uniq -c:
>     122 veth1
>     133 veth3
> 
> Fixes: 32607a332cfe ("ipv4: prefer multipath nexthop that matches source address")
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> index a5f3c8459758..c54b4ad9c280 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> @@ -2165,9 +2165,9 @@ static bool fib_good_nh(const struct fib_nh *nh)
>  void fib_select_multipath(struct fib_result *res, int hash,
>  			  const struct flowi4 *fl4)
>  {
> +	bool first = false, found = false;
>  	struct fib_info *fi = res->fi;
>  	struct net *net = fi->fib_net;
> -	bool found = false;
>  	bool use_neigh;
>  	__be32 saddr;
>  
> @@ -2190,23 +2190,24 @@ void fib_select_multipath(struct fib_result *res, int hash,
>  		    (use_neigh && !fib_good_nh(nexthop_nh)))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		if (!found) {
> +		if (saddr && nexthop_nh->nh_saddr == saddr) {
>  			res->nh_sel = nhsel;
>  			res->nhc = &nexthop_nh->nh_common;
> -			found = !saddr || nexthop_nh->nh_saddr == saddr;
> +			return;

This can return a match that exceeds the upper bound, while better
matches may exist.

Perhaps what we want is the following:

1. if there are matches that match saddr, prefer those above others
   - take the first match, as with hash input that results in load
     balancing across flows
      
2. else, take any match
   - again, first fit

If no match below fib_nh_upper_bound is found, fall back to the first
fit above that exceeds nh_upper_bound. Again, prefer first fit of 1 if
it exists, else first fit of 2.

If so then we need up to two concurrent stored options,
first_match_saddr and first.

Or alternatively use a score similar to inet listener lookup.

Since a new variable is added, I would rename found with
first_match_saddr or similar to document the intent.

>  		}
>  
> -		if (hash > nh_upper_bound)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (!saddr || nexthop_nh->nh_saddr == saddr) {
> +		if (!first) {
>  			res->nh_sel = nhsel;
>  			res->nhc = &nexthop_nh->nh_common;
> -			return;
> +			first = true;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (found)
> -			return;
> +		if (found || hash > nh_upper_bound)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		res->nh_sel = nhsel;
> +		res->nhc = &nexthop_nh->nh_common;
> +		found = true;
>  
>  	} endfor_nexthops(fi);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-13 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-13 13:58 [PATCH net 1/2] net: fib: restore ECMP balance from loopback Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-13 13:58 ` [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: fib_nexthops: Add test case for ipv4 multi nexthops Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-13 21:18   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-12-13 21:26     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-13 22:02       ` David Ahern
2025-12-15  6:59   ` Ido Schimmel
2025-12-15 16:13     ` David Ahern
2025-12-15 19:01     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-13 20:54 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2025-12-13 21:22   ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: fib: restore ECMP balance from loopback Vadim Fedorenko
2025-12-15 21:45     ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.5c4c191262c5@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.ord \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).