From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
ecree.xilinx@gmail.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, saeedm@nvidia.com,
tariqt@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org,
dsahern@kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com, kuniyu@google.com,
shuah@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com,
alexander.duyck@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-net-drivers@amd.com,
Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] net: gro: remove unnecessary df checks
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:32:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.d5fd7a312fe9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250915113933.3293-5-richardbgobert@gmail.com>
Richard Gobert wrote:
> Currently, packets with fixed IDs will be merged only if their
> don't-fragment bit is set. This restriction is unnecessary since packets
> without the don't-fragment bit will be forwarded as-is even if they were
> merged together.
Please expand why this is true.
Because either NETIF_F_TSO_MANGLEID is set or segmentation
falls back onto software GSO which handles the two FIXEDID
variants correctly now, I guess?
> If packets are merged together and then fragmented, they will first be
> re-split into segments before being further fragmented, so the behavior
> is identical whether or not the packets were first merged together.
I don't follow this scenario. Fragmentation of a GSO packet after GRO
and before GSO?
> Clean up the code by removing the unnecessary don't-fragment checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/gro.h | 5 ++---
> net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 3 ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c | 9 ++++-----
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/gro.h b/include/net/gro.h
> index 6aa563eec3d0..f14b7e88dbef 100644
> --- a/include/net/gro.h
> +++ b/include/net/gro.h
> @@ -448,17 +448,16 @@ static inline int inet_gro_flush(const struct iphdr *iph, const struct iphdr *ip
> const u32 id2 = ntohl(*(__be32 *)&iph2->id);
> const u16 ipid_offset = (id >> 16) - (id2 >> 16);
> const u16 count = NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->count;
> - const u32 df = id & IP_DF;
>
> /* All fields must match except length and checksum. */
> - if ((iph->ttl ^ iph2->ttl) | (iph->tos ^ iph2->tos) | (df ^ (id2 & IP_DF)))
> + if ((iph->ttl ^ iph2->ttl) | (iph->tos ^ iph2->tos) | ((id ^ id2) & IP_DF))
> return true;
>
> /* When we receive our second frame we can make a decision on if we
> * continue this flow as an atomic flow with a fixed ID or if we use
> * an incrementing ID.
> */
> - if (count == 1 && df && !ipid_offset)
> + if (count == 1 && !ipid_offset)
> NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->ip_fixedid |= 1 << inner;
>
> return ipid_offset ^ (count * !(NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->ip_fixedid & (1 << inner)));
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> index fc7a6955fa0a..c0542d9187e2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> @@ -1393,10 +1393,7 @@ struct sk_buff *inet_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> segs = ERR_PTR(-EPROTONOSUPPORT);
>
> - /* fixed ID is invalid if DF bit is not set */
> fixedid = !!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & (SKB_GSO_TCP_FIXEDID << encap));
> - if (fixedid && !(ip_hdr(skb)->frag_off & htons(IP_DF)))
> - goto out;
>
> if (!skb->encapsulation || encap)
> udpfrag = !!(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c
> index d5824eadea10..3d4a82a2607c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c
> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static void send_flush_id_case(int fd, struct sockaddr_ll *daddr, int tcase)
> iph2->id = htons(9);
> break;
>
> - case 3: /* DF=0, Fixed - should not coalesce */
> + case 3: /* DF=0, Fixed - should coalesce */
> iph1->frag_off &= ~htons(IP_DF);
> iph1->id = htons(8);
>
> @@ -1188,10 +1188,9 @@ static void gro_receiver(void)
> correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
> check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 1);
>
> - printf("DF=0, Fixed - should not coalesce: ");
> - correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
> - correct_payload[1] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
> - check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 2);
> + printf("DF=0, Fixed - should coalesce: ");
> + correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
> + check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 1);
>
> printf("DF=1, 2 Incrementing and one fixed - should coalesce only first 2 packets: ");
> correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
> --
> 2.36.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 11:39 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] net: gso: restore outer ip ids correctly Richard Gobert
2025-09-15 11:39 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] net: gro: remove is_ipv6 from napi_gro_cb Richard Gobert
2025-09-16 0:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-09-15 11:39 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] net: gro: only merge packets with incrementing or fixed outer ids Richard Gobert
2025-09-16 0:05 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-09-15 11:39 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] net: gso: restore ids of outer ip headers correctly Richard Gobert
2025-09-16 0:26 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-09-16 13:46 ` Richard Gobert
2025-09-16 15:52 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-09-18 11:56 ` Richard Gobert
2025-09-15 11:39 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] net: gro: remove unnecessary df checks Richard Gobert
2025-09-16 0:32 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2025-09-16 13:53 ` Richard Gobert
2025-09-16 15:57 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-09-18 11:59 ` Richard Gobert
2025-09-15 11:39 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] selftests/net: test ipip packets in gro.sh Richard Gobert
2025-09-16 0:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.d5fd7a312fe9@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@amd.com \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).