netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	"Garzik, Jeff" <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Brandeburg,
	Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	"Kok, Auke" <auke@foo-projects.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:29:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49ac8nwo83.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149787174.2928.3.camel@strongmad> (Mitch Williams's message of "Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:19:34 -0700")

==> Regarding Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI; Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com> adds:

mitch.a.williams> On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 11:44 -0700, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> That patch locks around the tx clean routine.  As such, it doesn't
>> prevent the problem.

mitch.a.williams> The call to netif_rx_schedule_prep provides locking
mitch.a.williams> because it sets the __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED bit atomically.
mitch.a.williams> The spinlock around e1000_clean_tx_irq is to protect it
mitch.a.williams> from other calls to the transmit routine, not NAPI.

Yes, but what prevents recursion in the poll routine?  Consider that the
poll routine could end up triggerring a printk (think iptables, here).  In
that case, you end up calling into netpoll, and if the tx ring is full, we
call the poll_controller routine.  We've now recursed.

The poll lock was originally introduced to prevent recursion, not
concurrent access.

-Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-08 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-05 23:09 [PATCH 0/2] e1000: fixes for netpoll+NAPI, ARM Kok, Auke
2006-06-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI Kok, Auke
2006-06-06 13:52   ` Neil Horman
2006-06-06 16:39     ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-06 17:05       ` Neil Horman
2006-06-06 17:18         ` Auke Kok
2006-06-06 17:30           ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-06 17:34             ` Auke Kok
2006-06-06 17:42               ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-06 23:17                 ` Matt Mackall
2006-06-07 15:05                   ` Neil Horman
2006-06-07 16:48                     ` Matt Mackall
2006-06-07 18:25                       ` Auke Kok
2006-06-07 18:44                         ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-07 19:18                           ` Neil Horman
2006-06-08 17:19                           ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-08 17:29                             ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2006-06-12  0:13                               ` Neil Horman
2006-06-12 16:42                                 ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-12 18:06                                   ` Neil Horman
2006-06-14 20:41                                     ` Neil Horman
2006-06-14 23:44                                       ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-15 12:44                                         ` John W. Linville
2006-06-15 20:45                                           ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-20  8:28                                             ` Andrew Grover
2006-06-07 18:54                         ` John W. Linville
2006-06-08 17:23                           ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-08 18:39                             ` John W. Linville
2006-06-06 17:29       ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] e1000: remove risky prefetch on next_skb->data Kok, Auke
2006-06-05 23:21   ` Rick Jones
2006-06-06  0:12     ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2006-06-06  0:16       ` Rick Jones
2006-06-06  0:22         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06  0:26         ` Brandeburg, Jesse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49ac8nwo83.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=auke@foo-projects.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=mitch.a.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).