From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Trond Myklebust
<trond.myklebust-41N18TsMXrtuMpJDpNschA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>,
Olga Kornievskaia <aglo-vtMw8L3fJ9vSiEDVxGk4TQ@public.gmane.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields"
<bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Jim Rees <rees-63aXycvo3TyHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc deadline scheduler performance regression for iozone over NFS
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:34:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49octv7qr8.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242258338.5407.244.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org> (Trond Myklebust's message of "Wed, 13 May 2009 19:45:38 -0400")
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust-41N18TsMXrtuMpJDpNschA@public.gmane.org> writes:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:29 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Hi, netdev folks. The summary here is:
>>
>> A patch added in the 2.6.30 development cycle caused a performance
>> regression in my NFS iozone testing. The patch in question is the
>> following:
>>
>> commit 47a14ef1af48c696b214ac168f056ddc79793d0e
>> Author: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo-vtMw8L3fJ9vSiEDVxGk4TQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Date: Tue Oct 21 14:13:47 2008 -0400
>>
>> svcrpc: take advantage of tcp autotuning
>>
>> which is also quoted below. Using 8 nfsd threads, a single client doing
>> 2GB of streaming read I/O goes from 107590 KB/s under 2.6.29 to 65558
>> KB/s under 2.6.30-rc4. I also see more run to run variation under
>> 2.6.30-rc4 using the deadline I/O scheduler on the server. That
>> variation disappears (as does the performance regression) when reverting
>> the above commit.
>
> It looks to me as if we've got a bug in the svc_tcp_has_wspace() helper
> function. I can see no reason why we should stop processing new incoming
> RPC requests just because the send buffer happens to be 2/3 full. If we
> see that we have space for another reply, then we should just go for it.
> OTOH, we do want to ensure that the SOCK_NOSPACE flag remains set, so
> that the TCP layer knows that we're congested, and that we'd like it to
> increase the send window size, please.
>
> Could you therefore please see if the following (untested) patch helps?
I'm seeing slightly better results with the patch:
71548
75987
71557
87432
83538
But that's still not up to the speeds we saw under 2.6.29. The packet
capture for one run can be found here:
http://people.redhat.com/jmoyer/trond.pcap.bz2
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <x49hc0f79k9.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20090508120119.8c93cfd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20090511081415.GL4694@kernel.dk>
[not found] ` <x49skjb21b7.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20090511165826.GG4694@kernel.dk>
[not found] ` <x494ovp4r51.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20090512204433.7eb69075.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <x49y6t1rqw0.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
2009-05-13 19:29 ` 2.6.30-rc deadline scheduler performance regression for iozone over NFS Jeff Moyer
2009-05-13 23:45 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1242258338.5407.244.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-14 13:34 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
[not found] ` <x49octv7qr8.fsf-RRHT56Q3PSP4kTEheFKJxxDDeQx5vsVwAInAS/Ez/D0@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-14 14:33 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1242311620.6560.14.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-14 14:38 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-14 15:00 ` Jeff Moyer
[not found] ` <x49ws8j686r.fsf-RRHT56Q3PSP4kTEheFKJxxDDeQx5vsVwAInAS/Ez/D0@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-17 19:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-17 19:12 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1242587524.17796.3.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-18 14:15 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-22 23:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-14 17:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20090514175500.GB5675-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-14 18:26 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1242325569.6560.27.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-15 21:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49octv7qr8.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=aglo-vtMw8L3fJ9vSiEDVxGk4TQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rees-63aXycvo3TyHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust-41N18TsMXrtuMpJDpNschA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).