From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Changli Gao Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rps: optimize rps_get_cpu() Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:48:49 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1272122227-13070-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com> <20100424.225128.52181685.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: therbert@google.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:37650 "EHLO mail-iw0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751038Ab0DYGtL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:49:11 -0400 Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so4025995iwn.16 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:49:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100424.225128.52181685.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, David Miller wro= te: > From: Changli Gao > Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:17:07 +0800 > >> optimize rps_get_cpu(). >> >> don't initialize ports when we can get the ports. one memory access = for ports >> than two. >> >> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao > > Applied, thanks. > > We can load both addresses in one go on 64-bit btw. > Are they always aligned to 64-bit boundary? I don't think so. --=20 Regards=EF=BC=8C Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)