netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "billbonaparte" <programme110@gmail.com>
To: "Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: "Netfilter Developer Mailing List"
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@trash.net>, <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, "Changli Gao" <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
	"Andrey Vagin" <avagin@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: netfilter: nf_conntrack: there maybe a bug in __nf_conntrack_confirm, when it race against get_next_corpse
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:52:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01b101cff7d2$1715ef20$4541cd60$@gmail.com> (raw)

(sorry to send this e-mail again, last mail is rejected by server due to
non-acceptable content)

Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> In function __nf_conntrack_confirm, we check the conntrack if it was 
>> already dead, before insert it into hash-table.
>> We do this because if we insert an already 'dead' hash,  it will 
>> block further use of that particular connection.

>Have you run into this problem in practice, or is this based on a theory?

If we insert a dead conntrack into hash-table, let's see what will happen to
the packet which has the same tuple with that dead conntrack:
1) if it is a valid packet, it will enter in nf_conntrack_in hook, then
2) we will find a corresponding conntrack for that packet in
__nf_conntrack_find_get, and there is no doubt that we will find that dead
conntrack,
  according to the current implement, we don't use dead conntrack, so we
create a new conntrack which is unconfirmed.
3) because there is already a conntrack with the same tuples in hash-table,
the new conntrack can not be inserted into hash-table, it will return
NF_DROP,
4) the packet will be dropped due to the failure of nf_conntrack_confirm.
That's why inserting an already 'dead' hash will block further use of that
particular connection.


             reply	other threads:[~2014-11-04  1:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-04  1:52 billbonaparte [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-07  6:47 netfilter: nf_conntrack: there maybe a bug in __nf_conntrack_confirm, when it race against get_next_corpse Bill Bonaparte
     [not found] <012601cff7d1$7ce2d620$76a88260$@gmail.com>
2014-11-06 13:00 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
     [not found] <02ef01cff25f$29887f60$7c997e20$@gmail.com>
2014-10-28  3:37 ` billbonaparte
2014-10-28  9:46   ` Florian Westphal
2014-10-28 10:11   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-10-28  3:27 billbonaparte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01b101cff7d2$1715ef20$4541cd60$@gmail.com' \
    --to=programme110@gmail.com \
    --cc=avagin@openvz.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).