From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH nft v2 1/2] evaluate: Perform set evaluation on implicitly declared (anonymous) sets
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 22:51:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03583cfdf6ad252f3c0472616a9e63178ee9d6ae.1590612113.git.sbrivio@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1590612113.git.sbrivio@redhat.com>
If a set is implicitly declared, set_evaluate() is not called as a
result of cmd_evaluate_add(), because we're adding in fact something
else (e.g. a rule). Expression-wise, evaluation still happens as the
implicit set expression is eventually found in the tree and handled
by expr_evaluate_set(), but context-wise evaluation (set_evaluate())
is skipped, and this might be relevant instead.
This is visible in the reported case of an anonymous set including
concatenated ranges:
# nft add rule t c ip saddr . tcp dport { 192.0.2.1 . 20-30 } accept
BUG: invalid range expression type concat
nft: expression.c:1160: range_expr_value_low: Assertion `0' failed.
Aborted
because we reach do_add_set() without properly evaluated flags and
set description, and eventually end up in expr_to_intervals(), which
can't handle that expression.
Explicitly call set_evaluate() as we add anonymous sets into the
context, and instruct the same function to:
- skip expression-wise set evaluation if the set is anonymous, as
that happens later anyway as part of the general tree evaluation
- skip the insertion in the set cache, as it makes no sense to have
sets that shouldn't be referenced there
For object maps, the allocation of the expression for set->data is
already handled by set_evaluate(), so we can now drop that from
stmt_evaluate_objref_map().
v2:
- skip insertion of set in cache (Pablo Neira Ayuso)
- drop double allocation of expression (and leak of the first
one) for object maps (Pablo Neira Ayuso)
Reported-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Reported-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
---
src/evaluate.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
index 506f2c6a257e..9019458be53e 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.c
+++ b/src/evaluate.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static void key_fix_dtype_byteorder(struct expr *key)
datatype_set(key, set_datatype_alloc(dtype, key->byteorder));
}
+static int set_evaluate(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct set *set);
static struct expr *implicit_set_declaration(struct eval_ctx *ctx,
const char *name,
struct expr *key,
@@ -107,6 +108,8 @@ static struct expr *implicit_set_declaration(struct eval_ctx *ctx,
list_add_tail(&cmd->list, &ctx->cmd->list);
}
+ set_evaluate(ctx, set);
+
return set_ref_expr_alloc(&expr->location, set);
}
@@ -3316,12 +3319,6 @@ static int stmt_evaluate_objref_map(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct stmt *stmt)
mappings = implicit_set_declaration(ctx, "__objmap%d",
key, mappings);
-
- mappings->set->data = constant_expr_alloc(&netlink_location,
- &string_type,
- BYTEORDER_HOST_ENDIAN,
- NFT_OBJ_MAXNAMELEN * BITS_PER_BYTE,
- NULL);
mappings->set->objtype = stmt->objref.type;
map->mappings = mappings;
@@ -3546,6 +3543,13 @@ static int set_evaluate(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct set *set)
}
+ /* Default timeout value implies timeout support */
+ if (set->timeout)
+ set->flags |= NFT_SET_TIMEOUT;
+
+ if (set_is_anonymous(set->flags))
+ return 0;
+
ctx->set = set;
if (set->init != NULL) {
__expr_set_context(&ctx->ectx, set->key->dtype,
@@ -3558,10 +3562,6 @@ static int set_evaluate(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct set *set)
if (set_lookup(table, set->handle.set.name) == NULL)
set_add_hash(set_get(set), table);
- /* Default timeout value implies timeout support */
- if (set->timeout)
- set->flags |= NFT_SET_TIMEOUT;
-
return 0;
}
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-27 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 20:51 [PATCH nft v2 0/2] Fix evaluation of anonymous sets with concatenated ranges Stefano Brivio
2020-05-27 20:51 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2020-05-27 20:51 ` [PATCH nft v2 2/2] tests: py: Enable anonymous set rule with concatenated ranges in inet/sets.t Stefano Brivio
2020-05-28 0:09 ` [PATCH nft v2 0/2] Fix evaluation of anonymous sets with concatenated ranges Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=03583cfdf6ad252f3c0472616a9e63178ee9d6ae.1590612113.git.sbrivio@redhat.com \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).