From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, yusongping@huawei.com,
artem.kuzin@huawei.com, anton.sirazetdinov@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 08/15] landlock: add support network rules
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 18:30:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06f9ca1f-6e92-9d71-4097-e43b2f77b937@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220309134459.6448-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>
On 09/03/2022 14:44, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
> This modification adds network rules support
> in internal landlock functions (presented in ruleset.c)
> and landlock_create_ruleset syscall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v3:
> * Split commit.
> * Add network rule support for internal landlock functions.
> * Add set_masks and get_masks for network.
> * Add rb_root root_net_port.
>
> ---
> security/landlock/fs.c | 2 +-
> security/landlock/limits.h | 6 +++
> security/landlock/ruleset.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> security/landlock/ruleset.h | 14 +++++-
> security/landlock/syscalls.c | 10 +++-
> 5 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
> index 75ebdce5cd16..5cd339061cdb 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/fs.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int check_access_path(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
>
> inode = d_backing_inode(walker_path.dentry);
> object_ptr = landlock_inode(inode)->object;
> - layer_mask = landlock_unmask_layers(domain, object_ptr,
> + layer_mask = landlock_unmask_layers(domain, object_ptr, 0,
> access_request, layer_mask,
> LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH);
> if (layer_mask == 0) {
> diff --git a/security/landlock/limits.h b/security/landlock/limits.h
> index 2a0a1095ee27..fdbef85e4de0 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/limits.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/limits.h
> @@ -18,4 +18,10 @@
> #define LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_FS LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM
> #define LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS ((LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_FS << 1) - 1)
>
> +#define LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP
> +#define LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET ((LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET << 1) - 1)
> +#define LANDLOCK_MASK_SHIFT_NET 16
> +
> +#define LANDLOCK_RULE_TYPE_NUM LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE
> +
> #endif /* _SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LIMITS_H */
> diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> index 7179b10f3538..1cecca59a942 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers)
> refcount_set(&new_ruleset->usage, 1);
> mutex_init(&new_ruleset->lock);
> new_ruleset->root_inode = RB_ROOT;
> + new_ruleset->root_net_port = RB_ROOT;
> new_ruleset->num_layers = num_layers;
> /*
> * hierarchy = NULL
> @@ -58,16 +59,32 @@ u32 landlock_get_fs_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset, u16 mask
> return ruleset->access_masks[mask_level];
> }
>
> +/* A helper function to set a network mask */
> +void landlock_set_net_access_mask(struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset,
> + const struct landlock_access_mask *access_mask_set,
> + u16 mask_level)
> +{
> + ruleset->access_masks[mask_level] |= (access_mask_set->net << LANDLOCK_MASK_SHIFT_NET);
> +}
> +
> +/* A helper function to get a network mask */
> +u32 landlock_get_net_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset, u16 mask_level)
> +{
> + return (ruleset->access_masks[mask_level] >> LANDLOCK_MASK_SHIFT_NET);
> +}
Both these helpers should be "static inline" and moved in net.h
> +
> struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const struct landlock_access_mask *access_mask_set)
> {
> struct landlock_ruleset *new_ruleset;
>
> /* Informs about useless ruleset. */
> - if (!access_mask_set->fs)
> + if (!access_mask_set->fs && !access_mask_set->net)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMSG);
> new_ruleset = create_ruleset(1);
> - if (!IS_ERR(new_ruleset))
This is better:
if (IS_ERR(new_ruleset))
return new_ruleset;
if (access_mask_set->fs)
...
> + if (!IS_ERR(new_ruleset) && access_mask_set->fs)
> landlock_set_fs_access_mask(new_ruleset, access_mask_set, 0);
> + if (!IS_ERR(new_ruleset) && access_mask_set->net)
> + landlock_set_net_access_mask(new_ruleset, access_mask_set, 0);
> return new_ruleset;
> }
>
> @@ -111,6 +128,9 @@ static struct landlock_rule *create_rule(
> landlock_get_object(object_ptr);
> new_rule->object.ptr = object_ptr;
> break;
> + case LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE:
> + new_rule->object.data = object_data;
> + break;
> default:
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> @@ -145,10 +165,12 @@ static void build_check_ruleset(void)
> .num_layers = ~0,
> };
> typeof(ruleset.access_masks[0]) fs_access_mask = ~0;
> + typeof(ruleset.access_masks[0]) net_access_mask = ~0;
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(ruleset.num_rules < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_RULES);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(ruleset.num_layers < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_LAYERS);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(fs_access_mask < LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(net_access_mask < LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -191,6 +213,12 @@ static int insert_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
Already reviewed.
[...]
> @@ -319,6 +363,9 @@ static int tree_merge(struct landlock_ruleset *const src,
> case LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH:
> src_root = &src->root_inode;
> break;
> + case LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE:
> + src_root = &src->root_net_port;
> + break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -338,11 +385,14 @@ static int tree_merge(struct landlock_ruleset *const src,
> return err;
> }
> layers[0].access = walker_rule->layers[0].access;
> -
nit: Please keep this empty line.
> switch (rule_type) {
> case LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH:
> err = insert_rule(dst, walker_rule->object.ptr, 0, &layers,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(layers), rule_type);
> + ARRAY_SIZE(layers), rule_type);
Please don't insert this kind of formatting in unrelated patches.
> + break;
> + case LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE:
> + err = insert_rule(dst, NULL, walker_rule->object.data, &layers,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(layers), rule_type);
> break;
> }
> if (err)
> @@ -379,6 +429,10 @@ static int merge_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
> err = tree_merge(src, dst, LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH);
> if (err)
> goto out_unlock;
> + /* Merges the @src network tree. */
> + err = tree_merge(src, dst, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_unlock;
>
> out_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&src->lock);
> @@ -398,6 +452,9 @@ static int tree_copy(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
> case LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH:
> parent_root = &parent->root_inode;
> break;
> + case LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE:
> + parent_root = &parent->root_net_port;
> + break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -410,6 +467,11 @@ static int tree_copy(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
> &walker_rule->layers, walker_rule->num_layers,
> rule_type);
> break;
> + case LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE:
> + err = insert_rule(child, NULL, walker_rule->object.data,
> + &walker_rule->layers, walker_rule->num_layers,
> + rule_type);
> + break;
> }
> if (err)
> return err;
> @@ -432,6 +494,10 @@ static int inherit_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
>
> /* Copies the @parent inode tree. */
> err = tree_copy(parent, child, LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + /* Copies the @parent inode tree. */
> + err = tree_copy(parent, child, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE);
> if (err)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> @@ -464,6 +530,9 @@ static void free_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset)
> rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(freeme, next, &ruleset->root_inode,
> node)
> free_rule(freeme, LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH);
> + rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(freeme, next, &ruleset->root_net_port,
> + node)
> + free_rule(freeme, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE);
> put_hierarchy(ruleset->hierarchy);
> kfree(ruleset);
> }
> @@ -565,6 +634,9 @@ const struct landlock_rule *landlock_find_rule(
> case LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH:
> node = ruleset->root_inode.rb_node;
> break;
> + case LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE:
> + node = ruleset->root_net_port.rb_node;
> + break;
> default:
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> @@ -586,8 +658,8 @@ const struct landlock_rule *landlock_find_rule(
> /* Access-control management */
> u64 landlock_unmask_layers(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
> const struct landlock_object *object_ptr,
> - const u32 access_request, u64 layer_mask,
> - const u16 rule_type)
> + const u16 port, const u32 access_request,
> + u64 layer_mask, const u16 rule_type)
> {
> const struct landlock_rule *rule;
> size_t i;
> @@ -600,6 +672,10 @@ u64 landlock_unmask_layers(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
> LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> break;
> + case LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE:
> + rule = landlock_find_rule(domain, (uintptr_t)port,
Type casting should not be required.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-09 13:44 [RFC PATCH v4 00/15] Landlock LSM Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/15] landlock: access mask renaming Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-01 16:47 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-04 8:17 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/15] landlock: filesystem access mask helpers Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-15 17:48 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-03-17 13:25 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-17 18:03 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-03-18 11:36 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/15] landlock: landlock_find/insert_rule refactoring Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-16 8:27 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-03-17 14:29 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-18 18:33 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-03-22 12:33 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-22 13:24 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-03-23 8:41 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-12 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/15] landlock: landlock_find/insert_rule refactoring (TCP port 0) Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-26 9:15 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/15] landlock: merge and inherit function refactoring Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/15] landlock: unmask_layers() " Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/15] landlock: landlock_add_rule syscall refactoring Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-12 11:12 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-26 8:30 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/15] landlock: user space API network support Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-12 11:21 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-12 13:48 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-12 14:05 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-12 16:10 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-26 10:17 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-25 14:29 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/15] landlock: add support network rules Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-08 16:30 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2022-04-11 13:44 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-11 16:20 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-12 8:38 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/15] landlock: TCP network hooks implementation Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-11 16:24 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-26 8:36 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/15] seltest/landlock: add tests for bind() hooks Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-01 16:52 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-04 8:28 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-04 9:44 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-06 14:12 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-08 16:41 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-26 9:35 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-05-16 10:10 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-05-16 10:22 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-04-04 18:32 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-04-06 14:17 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/15] seltest/landlock: add tests for connect() hooks Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/15] seltest/landlock: connect() with AF_UNSPEC tests Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/15] seltest/landlock: rules overlapping test Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/15] seltest/landlock: ruleset expanding test Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-09 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/15] seltest/landlock: invalid user input data test Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-15 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/15] Landlock LSM Mickaël Salaün
2022-03-17 13:01 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-17 17:26 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-03-18 15:55 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-23 16:30 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-24 12:27 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-03-24 13:34 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
2022-03-24 15:30 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-03-24 16:19 ` Konstantin Meskhidze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06f9ca1f-6e92-9d71-4097-e43b2f77b937@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=anton.sirazetdinov@huawei.com \
--cc=artem.kuzin@huawei.com \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yusongping@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).