From: octane indice <octane@alinto.com>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: good practice for compiling kernel + pom + iptables
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:57:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1173135444.45eca054dbd23@webmail.alinto.com> (raw)
Hello
Is there a "good practice" for recompiling kernel + pom + iptables in order
to have the maximum of choices available.
Is there a right order?
kernel, then iptables, then pom then kernel again and iptables again?
About pom.
I just downloaded the patch-o-matic-ng-20070219.
the usual:
KERNEL_DIR=<> IPTABLES_DIRE=<> ./runme base gives me just
4 choice of patch.
Is it Ok?
I'm currently writing some documentation and doesn't want to be wrong.
thanks
Tout doux les dépenses santé. Votre Assurance Santé à partir de 18€ par mois : http://www.alinto.com/pub/
reply other threads:[~2007-03-05 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1173135444.45eca054dbd23@webmail.alinto.com \
--to=octane@alinto.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).