* good practice for compiling kernel + pom + iptables
@ 2007-03-05 22:57 octane indice
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: octane indice @ 2007-03-05 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Hello
Is there a "good practice" for recompiling kernel + pom + iptables in order
to have the maximum of choices available.
Is there a right order?
kernel, then iptables, then pom then kernel again and iptables again?
About pom.
I just downloaded the patch-o-matic-ng-20070219.
the usual:
KERNEL_DIR=<> IPTABLES_DIRE=<> ./runme base gives me just
4 choice of patch.
Is it Ok?
I'm currently writing some documentation and doesn't want to be wrong.
thanks
Tout doux les dépenses santé. Votre Assurance Santé à partir de 18€ par mois : http://www.alinto.com/pub/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-03-05 22:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-05 22:57 good practice for compiling kernel + pom + iptables octane indice
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).