From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart De Schuymer Subject: Re: Locking issue Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:11:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1187287905.3005.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <177537.47029.qm@web7913.mail.in.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org To: Abhinav Srivastava Return-path: In-Reply-To: <177537.47029.qm@web7913.mail.in.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Op do, 16-08-2007 te 18:54 +0100, schreef Abhinav Srivastava: > > Hi there, > > This email is regarding ebtables code i.e. bridge > level filtering framework of netfilter. I have sent > this email to ebtables mailing list also but have not > heard from anyone. Hence, am sending this here too. I > hope i will receive some favorable response. > > I am new to ebtables code and looking for some help > related to locking and atomicity. I am interested in > looking into the packets intercepted by ebtables, > extract some information, pass this information to > userspace, wait for userspace response and then pass > the result back to ebtable code. What you seek is a QUEUE target as it exists for iptables. Unfortunately this doesn't yet exist for ebtables. Maybe you can get away with it by using the ebtables ulog watcher. cheers, Bart