netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@comx.dk>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Cc: Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	yasuyuki@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Make/compile error for iptables-1.4.0rc1
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:23:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1195395787.15945.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195390182.15945.57.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 13:49 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 21:32 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > SVN blame on iptables.c line 207-208 says its changed by Yasuyuki
> > Kozakai with chainset 6920.
> >
> > The strange thing about these lines is that they contain
> > IPT_SO_GET_REVISION_xxx and not XT_SO_GET_REVISION_xxx as the
> compiler
> > claims. Is some strange macro stuff going on here?
> 
> Does anyone else have this problem with iptables-1.4.0rc1, or is it
> just my compile environment which is screwed? 

Now I have tried to compile on three debian boxes (incl.
people.netfilter.org) where it fails!  I also tried it on a Gentoo box
where it success!  

The problem is "strange macro stuff" because on debian, the header file:
 /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h

Defines:
#define IPT_SO_GET_REVISION_MATCH       XT_SO_GET_REVISION_MATCH
#define IPT_SO_GET_REVISION_TARGET      XT_SO_GET_REVISION_TARGET

So fare it looks like a debian bug, in package linux-kernel-headers
(2.6.18-7), because the latest kernel has these defines:

#define IPT_SO_GET_REVISION_MATCH       (IPT_BASE_CTL + 2)
#define IPT_SO_GET_REVISION_TARGET      (IPT_BASE_CTL + 3)

Is this a debian bug? or did the kernel header at some point contain the
IPT_xxx to XT_SO_xxx re-defines?

Look below for what I could find in git...

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
  Jesper Brouer
  ComX Networks A/S
  Linux Network developer
  Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.
  Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


commit b96e7ecbd052a0916b6078e7600604d7e276a336
Author: Yasuyuki Kozakai <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
Date:   Tue Nov 14 19:48:48 2006 -0800

    [NETFILTER]: ip6_tables: fixed conflicted optname for getsockopt
    
    66 and 67 for getsockopt on IPv6 socket is doubly used for IPv6 Advanced
    API and ip6tables. This moves numbers for ip6tables to 68 and 69.
    This also kills XT_SO_* because {ip,ip6,arp}_tables doesn't have so much
    common numbers now.
    
    The old userland tools keep to behave as ever, because old kernel always
    calls functions of IPv6 Advanced API for their numbers.
    
    Signed-off-by: Yasuyuki Kozakai <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
    Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-18 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-16 20:32 Make/compile error for iptables-1.4.0rc1 Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2007-11-16 21:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-11-18 12:49   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2007-11-18 14:23     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2007-11-20 23:10       ` [FIX] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2007-11-21  7:53         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-21 11:21           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-11-21 19:30           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2007-11-22 10:31             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-23 14:30               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2007-11-23 16:16                 ` [PATCH] Fix make/compile " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2007-11-23 16:38                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-11-25 15:13                   ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-26  5:55                     ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
     [not found]                     ` <200711260555.lAQ5tXS0025231@toshiba.co.jp>
2007-11-26  6:23                       ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1195395787.15945.77.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jdb@comx.dk \
    --cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yasuyuki@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).