From: Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
To: jengelh@medozas.de
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xt_u32.c - make negative offsets work near / at the end of packet
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 02:36:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252197398-23863-1-git-send-email-soltys@ziu.info> (raw)
In the older version of u32 match there was a possibility to succesfully
use negative offsets while being at or near the end of the packet.
For example - a method presented in:
http://www.stearns.org/doc/iptables-u32.v0.1.7.html
... to find a tcp packet with no payload :
0>>22&0x3C @ 12>>26&0x3C @ -3&0xFF=0:255
But with current xt_u32.c code this is impossible due to subsequent
sanity checks:
if (at + val < at)
return false;
at += val;
pos = number;
if (at + 4 < at || skb->len < at + 4 (#3) ||
pos > skb->len - at - 4 (#4) )
return false;
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, at + pos, &n,
sizeof(n)) < 0)
In particular, condition (#3) will make the function return false, if
'at' is at / near the end of packet, regardless of the 'pos' value used.
Furthermore, (#4) would inhibit any "negative" 'pos' value anyway.
If I haven't missed anything, the whole sequence could be changed to:
at += val;
if (at + number + 4 < 4 || skb->len < at + number + 4)
return false;
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, at + number, &n,
sizeof(n)) < 0)
This allows both 'pos' and 'val' to be interpreted in any (+/-) way.
Sanity checks will keep the read in bounds, and the first condition will
be fine for unsigned values. I'm not sure how that approach would behave
on non-x86 architectures though.
Iptables doesn't complain about using negative values with -m u32, so I
assumed that original intent was to allow them.
Tiny patch below implements proposed changes.
Michal Soltys (1):
xt_u32.c - make negative offsets work near / at the end of packet
net/netfilter/xt_u32.c | 8 ++------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-06 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-06 0:36 Michal Soltys [this message]
2009-09-06 0:36 ` [PATCH] xt_u32.c - make negative offsets work near / at the end of packet Michal Soltys
2009-09-06 1:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-09-06 9:31 ` Michal Soltys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1252197398-23863-1-git-send-email-soltys@ziu.info \
--to=soltys@ziu.info \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).